1Thanks  |
|
January 24th, 2012, 12:58 PM
|
#1 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Southern California
Posts: 250
| Henry U.S. Survival Rifle
Anyone know anything about these? Its a sweet little setup and I am thinking about getting one. Wish they came in a wood stock, but maybe I just have not see that version.
Anyone had experience with one that can comment on accuracy and dependability?
Rifle pic. |
| |
January 24th, 2012, 01:17 PM
|
#2 | | Scout Sniper
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: under a rock IN CENTRAL MASS.
Posts: 822
|
I have the armalite version from the 60's, great little rifle. Will float if dropped in water. Never seen a production wood stock for them. Stock acts as a flotation chamber. Either assembled or stored.
|
| |
January 24th, 2012, 01:28 PM
|
#3 | | Scout Sniper
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Northwest
Posts: 826
|
Yea, Armalite originated this design intended as a part of a survival package for aircrews. The originals are quite collectable these days.
Several companies have owned the rights to this design over the years and made their versions of this rifle. I think that says something about the concept of the rifle.
Mine's not the Armalite model but I've had it for over 30 years. Not a match rifle by any means but it does what it's intended for. Intended to be a pot gun for close in distances. It will take small game at 30 yards pretty reliably.
I think every one should have at least one. |
| |
January 24th, 2012, 01:34 PM
|
#4 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,461
|
I don't have any first hand experience with one but if I were you I would do my research. The general consensus on a lot of survival sites seems to be that the Henrys are jam-o-matics.
|
| |
January 24th, 2012, 01:36 PM
|
#5 | | Automatic Rifleman
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: albany, ny
Posts: 141
| Henry
Just shot one last week, no problems. Own several early ones, Armalite, Charter Arms etc, they work.
|
| |
January 24th, 2012, 01:40 PM
|
#6 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: NC Florida
Posts: 10,138
|
I had one late 70s & 22 pistol was more accurate.
HH
|
| |
January 24th, 2012, 04:33 PM
|
#7 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 582
|
I would rather have a Springfield M6 in 22LR/410 bore, I have one in 22 Hornet/410 bore, its one of the newer ones made by CZ. Its better made then the AR7/Henry survival rifle and more accurate, I need to get the trigger guard off, it just in the way. they are a little expensive nowadays, when I got mine I think I paid less then $200.00 for it.
Casey
|
| |
January 24th, 2012, 09:18 PM
|
#8 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 249
|
I have had a AR-7 for about 30 years. Works great for what it is.
|
| |
January 25th, 2012, 04:29 AM
|
#9 | | Rifleman
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: hernando,ms
Posts: 57
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tmcfalls I don't have any first hand experience with one but if I were you I would do my research. The general consensus on a lot of survival sites seems to be that the Henrys are jam-o-matics. | Have a Henry AR7. As long as it's fed hi velocity it never jams!!!
'Mo
|
| |
January 25th, 2012, 07:20 AM
|
#10 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Idaho
Posts: 279
|
I bought a Henry brand new. Love the idea of it, but it turned out to be a complete POS. It's problems were
-the front site had to be hanging off the base to zero
-it consistentlt had FTF, and eject. Never got through 1 magazine, and tried just about every type off .22 lr.
-The mag would actually release itself from the catch and hit the dirt more reliably than the brass. At least once a mag.
-The worst trigger pull I have felt on a rifle, and very innacurate.
I filled out the warranty card, then realized that I would never trust or use this rifle even if they would "fix" it. Since I wouldn't sell it to anybody either it went into the box and was tossed into a closet never to see the light of day.
I guess it saved me some money, I will never buy anything Henry again.
|
| |
January 25th, 2012, 07:23 AM
|
#11 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Idaho
Posts: 279
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthquake I would rather have a Springfield M6 in 22LR/410 bore, I have one in 22 Hornet/410 bore, its one of the newer ones made by CZ. Its better made then the AR7/Henry survival rifle and more accurate, I need to get the trigger guard off, it just in the way. they are a little expensive nowadays, when I got mine I think I paid less then $200.00 for it.
Casey | This is what I originally planned to get instead of the Henry survival, but they stopped selling them, and used ones seem to fetch a premium over what they cost new.
|
| |
January 28th, 2012, 11:02 PM
|
#12 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 582
|
There allways the Marlin "Papoose" take down rifle for those dont like the AR 7 rifle.
Casey
|
| |
January 28th, 2012, 11:41 PM
|
#13 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: BumF**K Egypt
Posts: 1,120
|
I sold an original Armalite one last week in the shop from an estate. I cleaned it up and shot it before we put it out for sale and that little guy surprised me.
Put 50 rounds through it and I didn't have any problems. The bolt is pretty tough to operate and the trigger isn't too great but what do you expect? It was pretty accurate for what it was and I'd definitely pick one up myself if I got the chance.
I too have heard the bad stories on Henry's survival rifle.
|
| |
February 27th, 2012, 02:10 PM
|
#14 | | Fire Team Leader
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 181
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthquake There allways the Marlin "Papoose" take down rifle for those dont like the AR 7 rifle.
Casey | ^^^^^^WORD^^^^^^
Over the years I've had both the Armalite and Charter arms versions, no experience with the Henry.
They are both long gone, the Papoose is just flat superior in all respects and has been for the 15 or better years I've owned it.
Wet
|
| |
February 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
|
#15 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: The Last Best Place
Posts: 1,868
| Quote:
Originally Posted by wetdog1911 ^^^^^^WORD^^^^^^
Over the years I've had both the Armalite and Charter arms versions, no experience with the Henry.
They are both long gone, the Papoose is just flat superior in all respects and has been for the 15 or better years I've owned it.
Wet | I'd be careful about a new one though. Big reason I got a Rossi over a Marlin for my .45-70 is because if the horror stories about the QC on these "Remlins". You might not be any better off than a Henry. What a shame, considering Marlin's past quality...
|
| | | Moderator Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |