M14 Iron Sight Guide - Page 2 - M14 Forum

M14 Forum


M14 Iron Sight Guide

This is a discussion on M14 Iron Sight Guide within the Reference forums, part of the M14 M1A Forum category; Greetings, My Father is a retired Marine and is writing his Viet Nam Era Memoirs and has a technical question regarding the M-14 sights adjustments. ...


Go Back   M14 Forum > M14 M1A Forum > Reference

48Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old October 24th, 2013, 03:52 AM   #16
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: lexington park, MD
Posts: 2
Greetings,

My Father is a retired Marine and is writing his Viet Nam Era Memoirs and has a technical question regarding the M-14 sights adjustments.

Specifically: How many clicks elevation the M-14 has, but can't find a good set of numbers to go by.

I have noted that the M-14 rear sights are the same as the M-1.
My M-1 has 75 clicks for elevation adjustment.

If this is correct is there an manufactures manual or a Reference my Dad can cite in is Book.

Thanks

V/r Dave

Dave Brewer is offline  
Remove Ads
Old October 26th, 2013, 03:21 PM   #17
Dodgin' The Reaper
 
Different's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Posts: 9,224

Awards Showcase

I count sixty-four clicks from full bottom to 1100 meters using a USGI standard M14 rear sight on a 1980s SA, Inc. M1A receiver. The elevation setting for 100 meters is eight clicks from bottom on this rifle and typically is that as well on a USGI M14.

Thanks from CAVman and budster
Different is offline  
Old October 29th, 2013, 08:19 PM   #18
Old Salt
 
geepee3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 1,738
Two more front sights to add to your collection.
The first is one you mentioned but had no pictures.
The Globe hooded front sight with various apertures.






Second is the M79 front sight.
This is the tallest front sight you can put an M14/M1A rifle.
Blade width is .079"






Here it is compared to an XS standard height front sight, a SAI N.M. Scout front sight, and an XS Socom front sight with filed down blade.



As you can see it is the tallest of the bunch. And she's a "wide" body also.

Pezboy,
Thank you for taking the time and research to set up this guide.

Glenn

geepee3 is offline  
 
Old November 29th, 2013, 09:41 PM   #19
Automatic Rifleman
 
Sporting Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 134
Exclamation Thumper

Glenn:
The "M-79" shown in your pics-- That's from a grenade launcher, eh?


Thanks from geepee3
Sporting Lad is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 12:17 AM   #20
Automatic Rifleman
 
Sporting Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 134
Question Front sight height?

Hi, Pez--
I found this old thread whilst searching for info re targeting my M-14S/305 (18.5"). I've just finished replacing the factory rear sight with one from a USGI M-1 Garand. I've not been out to the range to sight in the new rear sight yet. I was at 19 clicks with my 100 yd zero because my front sight is very tall, or so it appears on my 18.5" barrel).

See how the top of the sight is above the level of its 'protective' ears. I'd like to get the blade and the aperture down out of the stratosphere, so I'm following the directions given by Fulton Armory on shortening the front sight.
But I must be measuring the height of my blade differently because it's not in the ballpark with the heights shown in your comprehensive post. Using the Fulton method of measuring from the top of the blade to the flat between its base and the protecting 'ears', I'm getting just ~0.440", yet you're showing the 'std' (22") M-14 height as .562" and the 'std tall' as ~.720".
According to my calculations, in order to end up with my 100 yd zero at ~7 clicks, I ought to be trimming ~0.10" from my existing front blade.
That would give me a height of ~0.340" and put the top of the sight just below its ears. Are my ears that much shorter than standard? Why does my sight look different that those posted on here? IDK-- Maybe the whole 'disproportionate' thing is an optical illusion. The numbers seem to make sense.

IDK if I'm measuring incorrectly or what, but I'd like to be certain I'm on the same page as you before I go filing and shooting, and making myself all crazy.

BTW-- My sight is ~0.080 wide (same as the std for 22") so I'll likely be needing something like a tall NM 0.062 on my 18.5" barrel ...(?)

Thanks for your very illuminating series of posts. If you or any other members can help me out here I'd be most appreciative.
Tom

Sporting Lad is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 02:55 PM   #21
Old Salt
 
DaMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,718
That is obviously WAY TO TALL. I have never seen one like that.

There are a couple options.

One is an M79 grenade launcher front sight, it is the right height and goes on the same way.

The other is the SAI front sight for the 18.5 inch barrels.

BILL RICCA's pic

DaMoose is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 04:33 PM   #22
Fire Team Leader
 
Long Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Saint Louis, Mo
Posts: 190
Well done indeed!

Long Ranger is offline  
Old December 2nd, 2013, 03:54 AM   #23
Squad Leader
 
BRONZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 245
Awesome thread

BRONZ is offline  
Old December 11th, 2013, 01:02 PM   #24
Lifer
 
hytekrednek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northport, AL, USA
Posts: 2,612
I understand, but you could add rear sight that use the ball and detent system to your list as well to help others learn.

hytekrednek is offline  
Old December 11th, 2013, 04:44 PM   #25
Site Sponsor
 
ShootingSight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,834
Very thorough report. I would like to add/amend to the rear aperture discussion.

Aperture diameter is not just personal preference. The smaller your aperture, the greater the depth of field will be, and the more sharply you will see the front sight, especially if you have limited vision. The only watchout is that as the aperture gets smaller, it lets in less light, and so on very dim days, exceptionally small apertures might provide too dim a sight picture.

ShootingSight LLC makes modified non-adjustable apertures, with steel inserts in USGI apertures to create 0.042", 0.0465", 0.052", and 0.0595" non-adjustable apertures. They also make NM hoods and hooded assemblies with the 1/2MOA adjustment in 0.0465" diameter.

ShootingSight also makes kits for rebuilding hoods that contain detent balls, belleville washers, c-clips, and an installation tool for the c-clip.

The correct lens insert for an M1 or M14 to offset your focus from infinity (which is where the uncorrected human eye will relax, or where eye doctors adjust the corrected eye to), is +0.50 diopters. This power will move your relaxed focal point to the hyperfocal distance of the front sight, so you can see the front sight and the target, with both in focus simultaneously.

Thanks from Bamban and Sporting Lad

Last edited by ShootingSight; December 11th, 2013 at 07:01 PM.
ShootingSight is offline  
Old December 12th, 2013, 12:00 AM   #26
Automatic Rifleman
 
Sporting Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 134
Question What can you do with a GI?

Art: Thx for that tip. Can you provide me with this +0.50 diopter insert for my (USGI) M-1 Garand aperture, or is it necessary to have a 'match' sight to begin with? If so, do you happen to know if it's possible to order just the hooded 'aperture' (ie c/w rack) or do I have to get the entire assembly? I just got done installing the complete M-1 sight.
Tom
ps-- Went to eyedoc for complete exam (A-OK) and described my shooting/acuity requirements. Ordered shooting glasses: Right eye mild correction for 20/20 (hyperfocus?) Left eye-- transition from distance to reading. Should be in tomorrow. Stay tuned to this frequency...
(I don't want a scope/red dot on my M-14)

.

Sporting Lad is offline  
Old December 12th, 2013, 05:53 AM   #27
Site Sponsor
 
ShootingSight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,834
SportingLad,

Usually if you want to use a lens insert, it is a small 3/8 diameter lens that is inserted inside the hood, so that solution won't work for a regular aperture.

I do sell just hoods, but there is no way to attach a hood to an existing aperture because there is some precision machining to be done to the rack. You would need to replace the entire rack/hood assembly, and even then you'd be limited, as the standard NM hood is too big in diameter, so it bumps into the sight base when you drop your elevation, so you lose several clicks on the bottom end of the travel - I think this issue was covered in the OP's thread.

That said, I make hoods that screw into an AR flip sight that are smaller in diameter. These have screw-in interchangeable apertures. So a project I am thinking about undertaking is to drill/tap a USGI rack to accept one of my hoods. The thought is that with a smaller hood, it might fit in a GI sight base without bumping. You would lose the 1/2MOA adjustability, but you could get reduced apertures.

This would not be Garand match legal, but it would be SR legal.

As to your doc's correction for your eyes, based on the front sight distance and the lens equations, the difference between your distance vision and your shooting prescription should be +0.5 in the sphere value of your prescription. Once you are shooting, you can tell if the lens is right, as a higher (more positive) sphere value will improve the front sight at the expense of the target, and a lower (or more negative) value will improve the target at the expense of the front sight. Your goal is to be able to see both with similar clarity at the same time.

Thanks from mic52 and Sporting Lad
ShootingSight is offline  
Old December 12th, 2013, 04:51 PM   #28
Old Salt
 
geepee3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 1,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sporting Lad View Post
Glenn:
The "M-79" shown in your pics-- That's from a grenade launcher, eh?

Yes it is.
The dovetail is the same size as for the M14/M1A platform.
It is primarily an option for the Socom rifles with the factory gas lock/muzzle brake.
Where it really shines is with a Aimpoint Micro on an Ultimak M-8.
The higher thinner blade works great for cowitnessing.
and centers the dot better.



M79 front sight, Socom large rear aperture with rifle in this configuration.

Glenn


Last edited by geepee3; December 12th, 2013 at 05:05 PM.
geepee3 is offline  
Old December 13th, 2013, 06:03 AM   #29
Snappin In
 
Balor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 35
Awesome work and a great informational guide. Thanks pezboy.

Balor is offline  
Old November 3rd, 2014, 11:00 PM   #30
Fire Team Leader
 
Firefight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NorCal
Posts: 214
Anyone see this?

http://www.trackofthewolf.com/list/Item.aspx/875/1

Firefight is online now  
Reply

  M14 Forum > M14 M1A Forum > Reference

front sight, iron sights, rear sight, sight, sights


Search tags for this page
best iron sights for m14
,
m14 front sight base
,
m14 sight
,
m14 sights hard to adjust
,
m1a peep
,
m1a sight adjustment
,
m1a sighting in iron sights
,

m1a sights

,
sight alignment sight picture usmc
,
why do i need a navy front sight on m1a
,
zero m1a iron sights
,

zeroing m1a iron sights

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Moderator Tools
Display Modes


Similar M14 Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
? USGI M14s NFA'34 jim-analog The M14 24 December 17th, 2015 01:44 AM
A few thoughts on SOCCOM 16's Gus Fisher Modern M14 200 September 9th, 2014 08:52 AM
Bad mouthing m14 THREE RINGS The M14 83 September 2nd, 2014 03:12 PM
USGI NM Stocks pezboy The M14 4 July 22nd, 2007 03:32 AM



Top Gun Sites Top Sites List