39Thanks  |
|
February 7th, 2012, 07:47 PM
|
#1 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 232
| The end for me and the "modernized M14"
I have come to the conclusion that the modern stocks, as great as they are, aren't doing it for me and my M1A needs. I've had 3 EBR Mod 0s, 2 Mod 1s, Troy MCS, and a VLTOR and I'm just not satisfied overall with any of them.
I'll give a brief reasoning behind each
EBR Mod 0- Great for a bench gun, but too heavy, and I never felt 100% comfortable shooting it.
EBR mod 1- Much better than the Mod 0, felt comfortable shooting it, found it very accessory friendly, but still overall, too heavy, and never really found the ideal optic setup for it. (tried Eotechs, Aimpoints, Trijicons, and Leupolds)
Troy MCS- Too heavy, too bulky, and didn't feel like an M14 to me at all. felt like a heavy clunky AR10
VLTOR- Nice, but didn't really feel all that much for $400 (used) over a standard Fiberglass stock
Now, I have not tried any of the bullpup designs, mainly because I want to retain the overall profile of an M14.
I think I'm screwed |
| |
February 7th, 2012, 07:53 PM
|
#2 | | Lifer
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Texas
Posts: 2,319
|
Your seem picky. I have heard from a lot of people the sage stock is way to heavy.
I have the VLTOR and your paying for that emod unit (the aluminum block the receiver rides against in the rear of the stock.
What didn't you like about it other that buyers remorse? you don't' like the wooden stocks?
you may be screwed as you say.
I sure don't like the look of the troy. personal preference is what its all about.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 07:59 PM
|
#3 | | Scout Sniper
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 825
|
I think many modern stocks are heavy. But that reduces real recoil. And they reduce felt recoil because they are often more in a straight line with the action than the more slanted wood. And as far as accuracy goes, I don't think anyone can realistically say wood will hold it's zero over the lifetime of a weapon like modern.
Wood looks very nice. It's very classic, it's traditional. It's easier to hump around with (though they still considered it too heavy).
But to each his own :)
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:03 PM
|
#4 | | Lifer
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: So. Cal
Posts: 4,814
|
Sometimes it is what it is. I don't think there's a perfect modern stock out there, they all have limitations and drawbacks. Just have to find out what they are and if you can live with them. Sounds like you tried them all and none met your expectations.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:04 PM
|
#5 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: wisconsin
Posts: 252
|
I find the 18.5 inch barrel in a walnut stock just about perfect!
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:06 PM
|
#6 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 232
|
I'm completely satisfied with my Supermatch in the E2 stock, with an ARMS 18 and NF scope, but my standard, I haven't found the ideal optics/stock setup yet. I think if I could properly mount an ACOG on it, that'd solve my optics issue, but I don't want a mile high cheek weld either.
I may have to try out the VLTOR again, if it doesn't work, I'm going to find another E2 stock and go with that.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:15 PM
|
#7 | | Fire Team Leader
Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Ca
Posts: 195
|
Sometimes knowing what you don't like is as important as knowing what you do like. Weight seems to be the kicker for you, which means no JAE and no McMillan. The McCann is supposed to be lighter, maybe that will work.
You didn't mention accuracy, so it doesn't seem important. Props for giving all those stocks a shot.
Keep searching and good luck.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:16 PM
|
#8 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 232
| Quote:
Originally Posted by mescalito Sometimes knowing what you don't like is as important as knowing what you do like. Weight seems to be the kicker for you, which means no JAE and no McMillan. The McCann is supposed to be lighter, maybe that will work. You didn't mention accuracy, so it doesn't seem important. Props for giving all those stocks a shot.
Keep searching and good luck. | I didn't mention accuracy not because it's not important, but because that hasn't been a downfall of any of the stocks I've tried.
I think the E2 is my ideal stock, but they are so damned expensive, I don't want to do anything to permanently mod them.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:23 PM
|
#9 | | Lifer
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: So. Cal
Posts: 4,814
|
Did you try an SEI mount with an ACOG? I doubt I'd ever bother trying to put an ACOG on an M1A/M14 just because they sit so high.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:27 PM
|
#10 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 232
| Quote:
Originally Posted by NoExpert Did you try an SEI mount with an ACOG? I doubt I'd ever bother trying to put an ACOG on an M1A/M14 just because they sit so high. | No, they still seem to sit quite high even in that mount, that's why I've never bothered. I think I'll just find a beat up E2 I wouldn't feel bad about changing up, then focus on an optic
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:28 PM
|
#11 | | Lifer
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Texas
Posts: 2,319
| Quote:
Originally Posted by NoExpert Did you try an SEI mount with an ACOG? I doubt I'd ever bother trying to put an ACOG on an M1A/M14 just because they sit so high. | you can't put an a cog on a normal mount. (unless your neck is super long)
you gotta buy the trijicon a cog mount, or make your own (as one user here did)
The whole thing is the rail has to go back beyond the charger guide dovetail.
as you can see the rail is pricy http://www.amazon.com/Acog-Profile-P...8675281&sr=8-1 |
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:33 PM
|
#12 | | Master Gunner
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 892
|
If you are looking for a new E2 stock. Check out www.law483.com.
Here are a couple of his E2 stocks.
Laminated stocks will give you strength and warp resistance.
The prices start at $475.00
Glenn
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:46 PM
|
#13 | | Platoon Commander
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Texas
Posts: 444
|
Well if you like the E2 stock but dont want to modife the original ones there is a Laminated copy made by LAW 483. Here is the link. http://www.law483.com/id56.html
And McMillan also makes an E2 style stock called the M2A, only problem is this one must be bedded to your rifle. Heres is the link.(Look in the middle of the page) http://www.mcmfamily.com/mcmillan-st...stock-list.php
If you dont like these i dont know what else there could be.
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 08:54 PM
|
#14 | | Fire Team Leader
Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Arizona
Posts: 220
|
Sorry you feel that way. I love my EBR, and years of sucking up mountains and across the desert with military weapons like the M-249 have made me a little more resistant to being annoyed by it's weight. But I could also understand doing that for a long time, and never wanting to again... What do you think of other 7.62 rifles like the AR-10 and SCAR-H? A Mk.17 SCAR could give you the same firepower as the M-14, and cut a lot of weigh too.
If you don't mind me asking, what do you do with your rifles that make the weight become an issue?
|
| |
February 7th, 2012, 09:13 PM
|
#15 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 232
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lurker01 Sorry you feel that way. I love my EBR, and years of sucking up mountains and across the desert with military weapons like the M-249 have made me a little more resistant to being annoyed by it's weight. But I could also understand doing that for a long time, and never wanting to again... What do you think of other 7.62 rifles like the AR-10 and SCAR-H? A Mk.17 SCAR could give you the same firepower as the M-14, and cut a lot of weigh too.
If you don't mind me asking, what do you do with your rifles that make the weight become an issue? | I like the M14s, and I can't afford a scar 17 yet. I like to shoot standing up, walking etc and the 20lb EBR doesn't work well for me with that
|
| | | Moderator Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |