21Thanks  |
|
January 13th, 2012, 12:38 PM
|
#1 | | Grunt
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Denham Springs LA.
Posts: 102
| Red Jacket ARs |
| |
January 13th, 2012, 12:47 PM
|
#2 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: DFW
Posts: 226
|
Looks familiar.... http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/p...elBlack+Finish
Get the s&w and have an extra $141.95 for a better looking flash hider, a few mags, and some ammo. That yhm qd mount can be had for $80.
I would personally never ever purchase anything with a red jacket stamp on it. The show gives me a headache and makes the gun community look pretty stupid. I wouldn't sell my company reputation for 15 min of fame.
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 01:11 PM
|
#3 | | Lifer |
Actually, I DID purchase something with 'Red Jacket' on it...
Years...Before The TV Show...
I wanted a can for an AK Pistol...
(Don't Ask Me Why I Get Into These Things...I'm An Addict And I Know It!)
NOBODY else I could find would even talk to me about Threading a can for the AK Pistol...
Except for some that wanted to 'custom machine' an Adapter !?
Finally Ended Up With Will and Stephanie...
They Made Me Exactly What I Wanted...(Wow! What A Concept!  )
The Can is not the 'prettiest' can I have...but it is very sturdy and reliable.
The biggest problem I had was my local Class III Dealer at the time was a total jerk about dealing with Red Jacket, and literally lied to me about the status of it several times...
Anyway...I can't say I'm a fan of the TV Show...I watched it a couple of times but wasn't drawn in...
But as to Will Himself...I Have Nothing But Good To Say About The Man!
Told Me What He Was Gonna Do, And Did It!
CAVman in WYoming
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 02:20 PM
|
#4 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: NC Florida
Posts: 10,133
|
Please keep posts on topic which is their AR. This thread has nothing to do with the show or the characters on the show.
HH
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 04:35 PM
|
#5 | | Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Bangor Maine
Posts: 5
| Red Jacket
You know that lower reciever looks like the ones I buy at auction arms for $60.00. Oldmarine
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 05:00 PM
|
#6 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 553
| Quote:
Originally Posted by oldman You know that lower reciever looks like the ones I buy at auction arms for $60.00. Oldmarine | yeah it definitly looks like an aero precision lower.
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 05:06 PM
|
#7 | | Scout Sniper
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: north carolina
Posts: 789
| Quote:
Originally Posted by boomer1983 yeah it definitly looks like an aero precision lower. | No, its hand carved by the artisans at RJF, The rifle will be a real ''game changer'' and will bring them Billions of dollars in military contracts.
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 05:10 PM
|
#8 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 1,862
|
So are their products really good or just plain crap? Does anyone else have any experience with them?
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 05:12 PM
|
#9 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Prattville, Alabama
Posts: 287
|
While they do look good, I think I'll pass on them. The biggest reason is the fact that they used uppers and lowers from two different manufacturers and it looks as though they were painted to match colors. If I'm paying money for a semi custom AR, I expect the receivers to be from the same company. It just looks amateurish to have them mismatched as bad as those two are. I'd pass as well on the plastic MagPull MOE furniture...it just doesn't tickle my fancy. And the BUIS looks like the MagPull plastic offering; something that important should be metal. And what kind of flash suppressor is that? What is it supposed to do better than the A2 hider?
Sorry, but for a rifle that looks as if it costs at least $1200 (hard to make out the price on that tag) I'd expect more attention to detail and better build quality. For that money, I'd be able to build my own a lot better than that.
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 05:15 PM
|
#10 | | Automatic Rifleman
Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: michigan
Posts: 128
|
Who is forging their lower, I know they are not?
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 06:55 PM
|
#11 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,251
|
This is a made for TV special AR. Its other companies parts put together to make ARs, like OCC does with motorcycles. Do they make any of the parts for this rifle? I would buy a Red Jacket AK.
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 08:01 PM
|
#12 | | Fire Team Leader
Join Date: May 2010 Location: Yorkville Illinois
Posts: 179
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Albud3 While they do look good, I think I'll pass on them. The biggest reason is the fact that they used uppers and lowers from two different manufacturers and it looks as though they were painted to match colors. If I'm paying money for a semi custom AR, I expect the receivers to be from the same company. It just looks amateurish to have them mismatched as bad as those two are. I'd pass as well on the plastic MagPull MOE furniture...it just doesn't tickle my fancy. And the BUIS looks like the MagPull plastic offering; something that important should be metal. And what kind of flash suppressor is that? What is it supposed to do better than the A2 hider?
Sorry, but for a rifle that looks as if it costs at least $1200 (hard to make out the price on that tag) I'd expect more attention to detail and better build quality. For that money, I'd be able to build my own a lot better than that. | I'm not really taking one side or the other cause I've never used any of their products but I did ask about the flash hider a while back - it's their QD muzzle break to mount their suppressors on.
|
| |
January 13th, 2012, 08:05 PM
|
#13 | | Platoon Commander
Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Florida
Posts: 494
| |
| |
January 14th, 2012, 12:22 AM
|
#14 | | Grunt
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Denham Springs LA.
Posts: 102
|
Not every rifle is everyones cup of tea. I know a guy that thinks, if it doesn't have COLT on it , it aint worth nothing. He also told me that all Smith & Wesson ever made was crap.
I have fired guns that Will has built and fired rounds through his suppressors. His guns work great and his cans are quite.
I gave two friends that have had custom work dune at Red jacket. One of them had two rifles cut down, an AR and a Ruger Mini 14. Both guns look great and shoot great.
|
| |
January 15th, 2012, 01:24 PM
|
#15 | | Squad Leader
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Prattville, Alabama
Posts: 287
|
Candyman: While I have no doubt that Will and his guys do good work and send out reliable weapons, I still have a couple of problems with the ARs shown in your pictures. While neither are major, they just make me wonder about some things.
The first I have already commented on: the mismatched receivers. While 90% of customers will never notice such things, to me it raises questions about the quality of the parts used at RJF. A firearms manufacturer must find the lowest priced parts of good quality in order to make a profit and stay in business. However, the effort and cost of finding matching parts (fit and finish) would only add minimally to the finished weapon and probably with less cost and time than it took to paint them. If they skimp on this, what else do they skimp on? More than likely nothing, but it does raise the question. BTW, I've built/repaired/modified somewhere around 50+ ARs for myself, friends and others. The only times I've used mismatched receivers are when the owners bought the parts themselves. Most of them had never noticed it until shown and some went back to get matching parts even if it cost them.
The other is the use of their QD suppressor mount/flash hider as seemingly standard equipment. While it may seem very improbable, if the wrong person sees this the owner may get unwanted attention from certain agencies. Personal experience: in '84 I shot a HP match at a local range with a newly built AR that doubled twice during the first round. I got off the line and replaced the sear, hammer and trigger and was able to finish the match with no other problems. About a week later I got a call from "Bob", a BATF agent I'd talked to in the past, asking me about the "automatic" rifle I shot at the range. I explained to him the problem, that it was fixed (bad trigger) and the part returned to the seller for replacement. Seems someone at the shoot had called the BATF about an 'illegal' M-16. Luckily, "Bob" knew me and called to see what was up, end of story. Imagine if a new hot shot that wanted to make a name for himself had gotten involved. At least a "friendly" visit from them, at worst a "no knock" on a known "gun nut". Nowadays, in the aggressively anti-gun regime we have in DC, with the BATFE always looking for any reason to illegally tighten the screws on law-abiding makers and owners, why give them any reason to suspect a completely innocent, law-abiding shooter has an illegal suppressor? All it takes is an over zealous agent, a supervisor looking for advancement, a liberal judge with very loose "reasonable suspicion" standards and someone gets a visit from your "friendly neighborhood BATFE SWAT" team at 0300 hrs and hope nothing goes bad. There are too many self-righteous, self-serving "public servants" willing to break the law to impose their law in this administration.
Plus, a screw-on mount is just so "old technology"! They loosen up during long strings of fire (has to do with different materials and heat absorption rates) and have a tendency to "launch" your $500+ "can" downrange damaged! Ask me how I know! If you're going to advertise your other products in such a manner, at least show you're up to date. The twist-on cam lock mounts as made by Gem-Tech and SureFire are much more reliable and secure than any screw-on mount.
While none of these problems are deal killers to the majority of new gun buyers, to those of us "in the know" and who look at the details, they do raise questions. The RJF ARs do look good and are more than likely very well made and reliable (unless Kris worked on them), but I think I'll pass.
|
| | | Moderator Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |