M14 Forum


SOCOM 16 review

This is a discussion on SOCOM 16 review within the The M14 forums, part of the M14 M1A Forum category; The current issue of American Rifleman has a big write up on the SOCOM 16 by SA. They seem to like it. Col. Cooper also ...


Go Back   M14 Forum > M14 M1A Forum > The M14


1Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old July 18th, 2004, 08:24 AM   #1
Grunt
 
C.R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: N.C.
Posts: 117
SOCOM 16 review

The current issue of American Rifleman has a big write up on the SOCOM 16 by SA. They seem to like it. Col. Cooper also said the following about the rifle in his current commentaries.


" We note a nifty new production from Springfield Armory, which is essentially a modernized version of the redoubtable M14. If you have a private army, you should probably consider this. It fires a 308 cartridge and can be fitted with something resembling a scoutscope. At just under ten pounds it is quite heavy for its power, but it features a very efficient muzzle brake and an indestructible plastic stock. What we need is a designator for it, so I guess the term we will have to use will be "Socom 16." That is not really satisfactory, but that is what we will have to call it."

Anyone have one of these? I have shot the scout verion and was looking for a comparison.

Thanks from SAPPNASTY
C.R. is offline  
Remove Ads
Old July 18th, 2004, 11:23 AM   #2
Master Gunner
 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 944
American Rifleman has never met a rifle or pistol it didn't love.

My "Bush" M1A weighs within a fraction of an once of my standard M1A with all USGI parts, so there's no weight savings.

7.62mm NATO as a combat rifle round appeals to many folks who ignore terminal ballistics and who don't have to carry the rifle and ammo :roll: .

-- Chuck

Chuck S is offline  
Old July 18th, 2004, 01:46 PM   #3
Grunt
 
C.R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: N.C.
Posts: 117
I agree that gun rags write way more positive than negative. I just thought it was cool to see an article on a M1A rifle. I am interested in the short SA just simply for manuverability in and around buildings/vehicles. I like the .308 as a combat rifle round. YES, it is heavy and 210 rounds in a combat pack are a B@%*H to carry. However, I like it and would rather have the .308 than the .223. I shot several of the DSA short carbines and a SA scout, so until I can get my hands on a SOCOM 16 I wanted a some input from those that have shot one or owned one.

C.R. is offline  
Old July 18th, 2004, 03:43 PM   #4
Snappin In
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck S
7.62mm NATO as a combat rifle round appeals to many folks who ignore terminal ballistics and who don't have to carry the rifle and ammo :roll: .

-- Chuck

Hey Chuck - Doubtless we all know the "politics" behind the adoption of the 7.62NATO over the Brits' 6.5mm way back when. And it looks like there is a good chance that the XM-8 will end up being standardized in the new 6.8mm, which is doubtless about what we should have done in the first place.

BUT, the military standard today is "controlled pairs" of 5.56 delivered at center mass of whatever you can see of the enemy... I can tell you that one round of 7.62NATO will do everything and more than any double-tap of 5.56 will. AND it will do it through walls, trees, vehicle doors etc. Supposedly the new 6.8 will, too... but there ain't a "controlled pair" of 5.56NATO yet that will equal one round of 7.62 in all-purpose performance.

The only real advantages that the 5.56 has is the weapon can be so much lighter, shorter and easier to manipulate in a cqb environment. And 5.56 is a much better urban cqb round where overpenetration is a concern - like for police or civilian self-defense. But there just is no way it's a better general-purpose military round.

Also - weigh out a combat load of a dozen loaded 30rd m4 mags next to eight m14 mags. Then do the math - 28rds in the m4 mags gives you 168 "double taps". 20rds in the m14 mags gives you 160 single shots. Now compare the weight vs the (double) effective range vs the ability to defeat "cover" vs the higher maintenance requirements for the m4/m16 and it really all depends on the mission whether one truly beats out the other.

...I know this is a tired old argument, but I just can't stand it when someone says the 7.62 is just flat "obsolete" as a military round. It might be if/when the 6.8 proves itself, but it isn't yet.

AShooter

ashooter is offline  
Old July 18th, 2004, 04:26 PM   #5
Dodgin' The Reaper
 
Different's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Posts: 8,946

Awards Showcase

Apparently, the M14 (and SR-25) has a place in combat today. The link includes a personal opinion After Action Report from a U S Army 19th Special Forces Group armorer who is finishing his tour in Afghanistan. I know this individual personally so I can vouch for his credibility. The thread is long but worthwhile IMO.

http://p198.ezboard.com/fzionscampfr...cID=1909.topic

From the link above:

"Man, everyone has dug up their old M-14's. The Rangers, 25th ID, 10th MTN, even the Marines had a bunch. Word got out quick that they were needed. The Marines had Leatherwood scopes on theirs so that tells you where those probably came from....."

Different is offline  
Old July 18th, 2004, 05:09 PM   #6
Snappin In
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 18
SOCOM 16

I have recently upgraded from a Bushmaster AR15 to the Springfield SOCOM 16. I use this weapon daily on duty in law enforcement. I had great success with the Bushy and my previous Colt AR15. I made the change bedause of the undeniable stopping power of the .308 round.

My initial purchase ($1,486.12) was a bit much for my taste, but I understand not a bad price.

I have experienced nothing but complete satisfaction from this rifle.

It is very handy and easy to manuever getting out of the vehicle in a hurry. Utilizing a tactical style sling I am able to transition to handgun or hands on depending on the situation. I notice a moderate increase in recoil from the .223, with little to no muzzle rise.

I definetly enjoy the tritium front sight post, and I have observed that the rifle has a natural pointablity.

The accuracy has been impressive with 100 meter groups under 2 inches from law enforcement shooting positions. I am sure that the rifle is more accurate than I can shoot.

I have experimented with ammunition from Black Hills, Federal, Hornady, Corbon and Remington. I have observed the best groups from the Hornady 168 gr TAP and the Black Hills 168 gr Match. I have yet to have any type of malfunction. I have accounted for 500 rounds through the rifle as of this date.

I am considering a see through type mount and an AimPoint red dot sight.

Thanks for the interest.

Be safe, come home every day.

Rich 8)

WAPD-191 is offline  
Old July 18th, 2004, 07:50 PM   #7
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
WAPD-191, thanks for the report on the SOCOM. Have you fired indoors by any chance? I'm wondering if the muzzle brake in combo with the short barrel increases the blast beyond safe levels when fired indoors. Is this a concern?

Yamabushi is offline  
Old July 19th, 2004, 01:21 PM   #8
Snappin In
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 18
Muzzle Flash / Indoor Experience

Yamabushi,

Thanks for the reply.

I have shot indoors a couple of times, once inside a middle school during a recent SWAT training. Using standard military blanks, there was a fairly impressive muzzle flash and equally impressive show from the porting on the muzzle brake. Still, I did not have any question about using indoors. The flash was not perceivable larger than that of the short barreled non-suppressed MP-5 shooting in the same environment. Using standard factory rounds, I did not perceive any handicap from the flash and was able to maintain a good sight picture for follow up shots. Our team has restrictions on using non suppressed weapons on clandestine laboratory entry from the perspective of the explosive gasses in the environment.

Thanks again.

Be Safe, Go home every day.

Rich 8)

WAPD-191 is offline  
Old July 19th, 2004, 01:53 PM   #9
Rifleman
 
LAWCOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan, in the fingers
Posts: 72
I ALREADY have a M21T, a rack standard(which I used for the postal match and sent in target today) and an original M1A A1 "guerrilla gun" with the folder stock.

I fired one of the Socom 16s a few weeks ago and I was thinking about HOW NEAT one would be in a GOOD side folder once the AWB expires. Talk about handy......
I don't know if I will pop the BIG BUCKS or not, BUT ...maybe if someone comes out with a slick folder for it, like the H&K PDW stock, will be sorely tempted.

My experieince with the Socom was it fired everything I ran through it. Seemed to be hitting what I was aiming at and wasn't that offensive in the noise department, though at night I understand the flash IS impressive.
If I got one would probably put a scout mount on it if it would work and set up a nice 2X EER with thick hairs on it. VERY FAST.

Have to wait and see.

LAWCOP is offline  
Old July 19th, 2004, 03:41 PM   #10
TEA
Master Gunner
 
TEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cleburne, TX
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAWCOP
I don't know if I will pop the BIG BUCKS or not, BUT ...maybe if someone comes out
On a side note, did anyone else see the Mail Call marathon last week and the episode with the SEALs? If so, did you notice the interesting stock on the M14 that the Gunny was checking out when the SEAL Chief was showing him their weapons? Looked like a USGI synthetic that someone had added a pistol grip and H&K style sliding stock to, and also had a Knigts Armament handguard with the rails. Looks like what you'd be interested in.

TEA is offline  
Old July 19th, 2004, 07:44 PM   #11
Snappin In
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEA
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAWCOP
I don't know if I will pop the BIG BUCKS or not, BUT ...maybe if someone comes out
On a side note, did anyone else see the Mail Call marathon last week and the episode with the SEALs? If so, did you notice the interesting stock on the M14 that the Gunny was checking out when the SEAL Chief was showing him their weapons? Looked like a USGI synthetic that someone had added a pistol grip and H&K style sliding stock to, and also had a Knigts Armament handguard with the rails. Looks like what you'd be interested in.
I'm almost positive that is the Troy Industries Sopmod M14.

www.troyind.com

scottinhawaii is offline  
Old July 20th, 2004, 12:53 PM   #12
Snappin In
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 18
Scout Rail

LAWCOP,

The SOCOM comes with a Scout Rail standard. I agree that some sort of collapsible stock would make it even handier, but also even more expensive...

Be safe, Come home every day.

Rich 8)

WAPD-191 is offline  
Old July 20th, 2004, 03:13 PM   #13
Master Gunner
 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 944
Ashooter --

You'll "tell me" based on what direct experience with these cartridges? 8) I have "a bit" and will take 5.56mm over 7.62mm any day round for round not merely pound for pound.

RTLW,

-- Chuck

Chuck S is offline  
Old July 20th, 2004, 07:06 PM   #14
Automatic Rifleman
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 142
My impressions from a while ago.....

http://www.m-14forum.com/viewtopic.p...45327164662a69

PapaFoxtrot is offline  
Old July 21st, 2004, 06:38 AM   #15
Rifleman
 
LAWCOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan, in the fingers
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck S
Ashooter --

You'll "tell me" based on what direct experience with these cartridges? 8) I have "a bit" and will take 5.56mm over 7.62mm any day round for round not merely pound for pound.

RTLW,

-- Chuck
DON'T know who this was directed at Chuck, but I have shot LOTS of "mammals" in my life and one of the FIRST and most important aspect of any round unless you get up to the REALLY BIG is shot placement. No question, a 7.62 in the finger will not have the effect of a 5.56 between the eyes.
HOWEVER, in all MY experience, with all things being equal, BIGGER bullets have always been better then SMALLER bullets.

I never happened to me, but several of the folks I worked with had complained about hitting people several times with the 5.56 and not seeing the effect they desired...like instant incapacitation and death. Others thought it was a magic bullet that killed like SHIVA.

I go back to bullet placement AND when both rounds hit the same spot, in my experience, bigger just works better.

In my years of LE I know I have responded to and worked well over 1000 shootings, and if I kept really good track it was probably over 2000, but they kind of run together after a while.
Have seen people shot with just about every normal rifle caliber and EVERY round you can stick in a handgun. Have seen folks hit with everything from number 9 birdshot to slugs and buck.(being a ghetto police officer is a WONDERFUL experience) I was also in the position to have a really good look at the shooting situations without the distractions of combat.

THe long and short is the more weight you throw the better it works, the bigger the diameter the better it works.

When discussions go to "what handgun caliber is best" ...my response is "the reason I carry a .45 is because they don't make a .46"
I have seen REALLY pizzed off people who have been shot with .38, 357s 9mms storming about a house because someone shot him and what he was going to do to him in revenge. I had one guy who was shot 4 times in the chest with a 9mm, who I had to forcibley make sit down because he was bleeding out and I didn't want him dying on me. (hardball ammo no major bones or organs hit although he was bubbling from a lung nick)
I have never seen anyone up and walking around when hit with a caliber beginning with .4 They are not a magic death wand, the people mostly live, but they just have all the fight taken out of them.

No matter what the caliber though, NOTHING beats proper shot placement.

LAWCOP is offline  
Reply

  M14 Forum > M14 M1A Forum > The M14



Search tags for this page

m1a socom 16 review

,

m1a socom review

,
socom 16
,

socom 16 review

,
socom 16 reviews
,
socom m1a review
,
springfield armory socom 16 review
,
springfield m1a socom 16 review
,
springfield m1a socom review
,

springfield socom 16 review

,
springfield socom 16 reviews
,
springfield socom reviews
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Moderator Tools
Display Modes


Similar M14 Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SOCOM 16 it is 1911A1Guy Modern M14 96 May 11th, 2012 05:30 AM
Marine SOCOM Team ..... SixTGunr The M14 16 May 10th, 2012 11:02 AM
SAI, SOCOM II Handguard Replacement dpast32 The M14 3 April 10th, 2012 07:21 AM
Troy MCS range review #1 with Richmond P.D. (CA) Broken Arrow 13 The M14 18 June 4th, 2007 04:01 PM
Squad, SOCOM, SOCOM II, questions plus others. Nikokurausu The M14 12 August 8th, 2005 07:41 AM



Top Gun Sites Top Sites List