 |
|
January 20th, 2012, 06:12 PM
|
#1 | | Platoon Commander
Join Date: May 2004 Location: WESTERN OHIO
Posts: 435
| Federal ord tanker |
| |
January 20th, 2012, 06:23 PM
|
#2 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: NC Florida
Posts: 10,131
|
FedOrds were hit or miss as per their M14s. But if the rifle shoots well I wouldn't worry about. While FedOrd was in business I don't think there was any China parts being made for the M1.
Value is whatever it is worth to you.
HH
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 06:52 PM
|
#3 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Surrounded in Central California
Posts: 640
|
Depending on how much money he owes you it may be a good deal. USGI receiver, and most of the parts will e USGI. If you wanted, you could convert it back to a standard Garand with a barrel, op rod, spring and handguards.
Receiver does not appear to be a "reweld" or welded receiver.
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 07:06 PM
|
#4 | | Lifer
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 2,585
|
It's a chop-tanker. Probably a re-welded receiver. Look it over carefully. Some re-welds are done very well, others not so hot. If it's a sound piece I wouldn't mind owning it for a brush-country rifle.
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 07:36 PM
|
#5 | | Old Salt
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Salem, Or
Posts: 1,863
|
Winchester receiver and a Win bolt, are those flush nut lock bar rear sight? those are a few bucks for sure. I see plenty of trading material if your looking for a project rifle.
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 07:48 PM
|
#6 | | Rifleman
Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: wisconsin
Posts: 67
| Grab It.
I'd grab it if I were you. Don't listen to all the nay Sayers about Federal Ord. They made a lot more good rifles than bad. Only thing I'd check is to be sure the receiver isn't welded. If not, take it and don't look back.
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 08:09 PM
|
#7 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: NC Florida
Posts: 10,131
|
Yes, lock bar rear sight means its an older receiver normnally.
HH
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 08:19 PM
|
#8 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Surrounded in Central California
Posts: 640
|
Doubtful that it is a welded receiver. It has a -2 front receiver half, which is Winchester.
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 08:42 PM
|
#9 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: NC Florida
Posts: 10,131
|
If its 30/06 no reason to suspect that it would be welded.
HH
|
| |
January 20th, 2012, 09:13 PM
|
#10 | | Lifer
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: mountain west
Posts: 3,047
|
How much does he owe you ? I paid $650 for my fed ordtanker which was probably too much. But I like it. Mine isn'ta reweld.
|
| |
January 21st, 2012, 06:08 AM
|
#11 | | Platoon Commander
Join Date: May 2004 Location: WESTERN OHIO
Posts: 435
|
what could I expect to get out of it if I take it?
|
| |
January 21st, 2012, 07:49 AM
|
#12 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Surrounded in Central California
Posts: 640
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MARINES84-88 what could I expect to get out of it if I take it? | Check out Gunbroker.com for Tanker prices. There is currently a Fed Ord Tanker on there and his asking price is $1100.
|
| |
January 21st, 2012, 08:43 AM
|
#13 | | Lifer
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 2,585
|
I wouldn't consider less than $1,500 for my SA '43 BA rebuild Tanker. If not re-welded, you'll have a WRA receiver, bolt, and lockbar. Stock? Either way, people pay more for WRA's than SA's.
|
| |
January 22nd, 2012, 08:24 AM
|
#14 | | Grunt
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 81
| Quote:
Originally Posted by huntinghawk If its 30/06 no reason to suspect that it would be welded.
HH | From the Garand Collector's Assn.
Tanker:
A deceptive term for a shortened commercial version of the M1. Near the end of WW II a cut down M1 was tested and rejected. Gun dealers later began to manufacture this type to sell many of the welded receivers they had made (see REWELD), and coined the term “Tanker” to suggest use by tank crews.
Reweld:
The common collector term for a rifle made from demilled receiver halves (see DEMIL). In the 1960’s and 1970’s the government destroyed surplus M1 rifles by cutting the receiver in half with a torch. Dealers bought the scrap halves and welded them back together to make rifles, especially the so-called “Tanker” Garands. http://www.thegca.org/glossary-of-terms#REWELD |
| |
January 22nd, 2012, 08:42 AM
|
#15 | | Lifer
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 2,585
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillipM Dealers bought the scrap halves and welded them back together to make rifles, especially the so-called “Tanker” Garands. * * * *
| Which is precisely why a re-welder with some skill and both halves of a WRA receiver could keep it all WRA.
A first-rate honest Tanker you'll always come out on if you pay fair value going in. A re-weld you probably won't. Prospective purchasers will be alert.
|
| | | Moderator Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Similar M14 Forum Discussions | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | USGI Issue M-14 | Sparky | The M14 | 15 | November 29th, 2005 01:23 PM | |