 |
|
August 26th, 2011, 04:15 AM
|
#1 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: NY
Posts: 1,877
| NOS Garand Barrel Accuracy
So I had my recently acquired (SA-52 Rebuild Program) Garand re-barreled the other week...
I got a 4-52 SA barrel still packed w/cosmoline and wrapped in cheese cloth to replace the bent one on the rifle
Spent considerable time getting the cosmoline off and out of the barrel...a chore I hated since being a kid
when my Dad would hand me his latest surplus Ye Olde Shooter rifle ordered from the inside back page of the American Rifleman
I used Tony at Orion for the Indexing and Short Chamber finishing while I waited
Took some of my first-quality hand loads to the range and got a nice shotgun pattern grouping :-/
Granted the action needed to settle back into the stock but by Round 25 I figured it found its natural home
Does the barrel need to "shoot-in"?
If so at what round-count could I expect to see some closing up of the groups?
I got better groups with the bent barrel albeit with the sights nailed hard left at the rear and hard right at the front to get on paper
This is a brand spanking new GI barrel and I have never before had such a thing on any Garand I have owned
so I am trying to get my expectations in line with reality
Thanks
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 04:42 AM
|
#2 | | Scout Sniper
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: under a rock IN CENTRAL MASS.
Posts: 822
|
What are the group sizes? Is there any stringing?
By the by, gasoline would have cleaned the tube in 5 min.
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 04:47 AM
|
#3 | | Lifer
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 7,891
|
Should break in around 1000 rounds or so. If by then it's not broken in all you need to do is leave it at bench #1 at calverton and I'll pick it up. I'll do my best to finish the job. I'll drag my Garand out this weekend, take a few shots with it and let me know what you think of the GI barrel. Regardless how that barrel shoots it's not going anywhere so you better start dialing in those loads. I am disappointed you used the evil one to screw that barrel on. Is that the same barrel you had last time we were at the range?
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:08 AM
|
#4 | | Platoon Commander
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Western MI.
Posts: 447
|
I've been of the understanding that 40% of Garand accuracy can be attributed to the way the receiver fits in the stock. If the receiver moves around in the stock, you'll never get the accuracy you seek. The M1 is a finicky animal and there are multiple reasons why you're not seeing decent accuracy. Start with the receiver fit in the stock. Gus has an excellent article on Garand accuracy here for the John C. Garand matches that touches on a lot of the issues one can run into with the M1. John C. Garand Match legal modifications |
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:10 AM
|
#5 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Georgia
Posts: 566
|
Have you done any other accurizing to the gun?
Sounds like the only difference was a new barrel so I am assuming that everything about the action is the same (TG lockup, peened sights, stock interference on op-rod and fit to receiver). You can ensure the gas system fits well with the new barrel.
I have a couple of NOS barrels as spares but not shot one. I have several Garands that have MW<1 and TE<3 that I am pretty sure were never shot. I will say that they all shoot a bit differently. I only spend the time to develop a load for the one's I am going to compete with.
Start with some cracked HXP as a benchmark on the group and let us know what you are getting.
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:13 AM
|
#6 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,539
|
I dont get Shotgun groups but I dont find those NOS barrels to be all that great a barrel. I have had two built on them.
You should be able to hold a 3-4 inch group with good surplus, better with handloads
Just exactly do you consider a Shotgun group??
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:13 AM
|
#7 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: NY
Posts: 1,877
|
Socom42....There is at least a 12 inch spread and no stringing or anything remotely resembling a pathology
random scatter...yup gasoline would have done the trick
but it was 3 a.m. and I was in the house....and my wife is still fuming about the old 1966 Norton I frame-up restored/reassembled on the family room coffee table this past winter
82nd...yes the very same one...sorry I used your "evil one"... he was close, he let me wait to oversee barreling and chambering and he did a good job and at a fair price I might add (not to salt your wounds here)
I should probably get some "cheap(er)" blammo to wear the bore in
if I am looking at a 1K round count to get the thing humming
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:20 AM
|
#8 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: NY
Posts: 1,877
|
The only change was the barrel...all else was as previous
no accurizing..... tight sights fore and aft
was using hand-weighed 150 gr. SMK match rounds on 3rd cycle Winchester brass and cci #34 primers and IMR 4895 individually scale-weighed charges so the ammo consistency is not an issue beyond maybe not being the right formula for the rifle
My biggest fear was touched on by Orlando...that these tubes aren't up to the same par as the older war era tubes
oh well I guess time will tell...thanks guys
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:20 AM
|
#9 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,539
|
I would look at stock fit. Is it a commercial or USGI stock?
Does the trigger gaurd lock up tight, get hard resistance 1/2 before closing?
Do the tilt test
Look for rubbing of the Op Rod on the stock ferrule and inside the stock
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:26 AM
|
#10 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,539
|
Even though I dont think they are the greatest barrels they will shoot much better than what you are getting.
Take a look at my write up on stock fit in this thread about 10 posts down m1 accuracy problem
Hows the of the barrel crown look?
Are you shooting from a rest with the forearm setting on the bag?? If so move the rest back. The handguard is open underneath and the Op Rod will rub on the bag causing inconsistant groups
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:30 AM
|
#11 | | Old Salt
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: NY
Posts: 1,877
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando I would look at stock fit. Is it a commercial or USGI stock?
Does the trigger gaurd lock up tight, get hard resistance 1/2 before closing?
Do the tilt test
Look for rubbing of the Op Rod on the stock ferrule and inside the stock |
Stock is an unmarked GI replacement of some variety, the lock-up is fair, not as tight like we all like it ......but it worked well enough for the old round-about barrel to group (albeit where it wanted to)
I have an as-new op rod coming from Claude at RA Parts today I hope.... as I was not happy with the tab and piston condition on the existing one...
so when I install that I will do all the contact-point checks
I shot on the bags for best possible accuracy rifle on the bags just ahead of the floor plate...the crown is pristine new
82nd and I are planning a Saturday shoot since Irene should be hitting on Sunday so we'll see how it goes then..
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 05:54 AM
|
#12 | | Scout Sniper
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Missouri
Posts: 701
| Gas Cylinder and Gas Lock
You may have seen this in the M1 Accuracy thread TCAF referenced.
Check the gas cylinder fit. Shouldn't have any movement; if it does, carefully peen the lower splines. I tap the barrel splines edges very lightly with a punch, start the gas cylinder and then thread the gas cylinder lock so it pushes the gas cylinder on as it tightened. I index the lock to about 6 o'clock after the gas cylinder hole is centered under the barrel's gas port.
Ammo is a big variable, too. Good luck.
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 06:15 AM
|
#13 | | Grunt
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 99
|
I installed an NOS M1D barrel 6 months ago. When I took the caps off the barrel, you could see cutter marks all through the barrel. The first 60 rounds were incredibly inaccurate, to the point I set it aside and started working on other projects. After around 80 rounds, the groups started to shrink considerably. It could be related to any number of factors, but I think it was mostly the barrel being polished out by firing.
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 09:00 AM
|
#14 | | Designated Marksman
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Georgia
Posts: 566
|
It may not give you what you are looking for but 12" at 100yd is BAD.
You should be able to get down to at least 3-4" with the accurizing techniques above and probably better.
|
| |
August 26th, 2011, 09:51 AM
|
#15 | | Lifer
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 7,891
|
If we go this weekend I will bring mine and you can swap out stocks to see if that helps.
|
| | | Moderator Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |