M14 Forum


.45 / 70 Marlin or Winchester close support Scout rifle ?

This is a discussion on .45 / 70 Marlin or Winchester close support Scout rifle ? within the Lever Action forums, part of the Gun Forum category; I am looking to build up a lever .45 / 70 as a close support Scout rifle. The 2 main choices for base are from ...


Go Back   M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Lever Action


Like Tree2Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old June 8th, 2004, 06:16 AM   #1
Old Salt
 
24kshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Western States
Posts: 1,030
.45 / 70 Marlin or Winchester close support Scout rifle ?

I am looking to build up a lever .45 / 70 as a close support Scout rifle. The 2 main choices for base are from Marlin and Winchester. Marlin appears a bit better designed - any thoughts pro / con ?

24kshooter is offline  
Remove Ads
Old June 8th, 2004, 07:12 AM   #2
"Staff Alumni"
 
Steve k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 2,653
Quote:
I am looking to build up a lever .45 / 70 as a close support Scout rifle
Close support for what, bear 8O :lol: I have a Marlin, sent it over to Wild West Guns in Alaska. They turned it into a Copilot. Ported the barrel and cut the action so now it break down into two peices. Shot an 11' brown bear with it, with one shot. A defenant bear stopper. Not much use for it around here except to sling 300gr bullets down range an punch giant holes in the paper which is OK with me because she is a great rifle and fun to shoot. If you can defenatly try and get the barrel ported it make a big difference.

Steve k is offline  
Old June 8th, 2004, 10:23 PM   #3
Master Gunner
 
Bigchoad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SSF Bay Area PRK
Posts: 895
Get the Marlin Guide Gun and load it with Buffalo Bore brand ammo The Marlin is tough enough to handle it and the BB ammo gets darn close to .458 Win Mag power

Bigchoad is offline  
Old June 14th, 2004, 08:34 PM   #4
Platoon Commander
 
mustanger98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Union County, GA, CSA
Posts: 484
You know, Lyman #66LA fits the Marlin 336 and 1894.

Williams makes two or three variations of the "FP" (Fool Proof) which is kinda like the Lyman from what I can tell from the Midway catalog. And "Guide" rear sights- they make them to fit a levergun.

For what it's worth, I have the Guide sight on my H&R break-open which is now produced by Marlin. The Guide sight is set up so that you sight it in at whatever distance, tighten the screws down and leave it there, and know the holdover for whatever other distances you think you might have to shoot.

mustanger98 is offline  
Old September 10th, 2004, 06:41 PM   #5
Snappin In
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: WYOMING, USA!!
Posts: 28
The Marlin!! I too have one, the Guide rifle, sweet shootin and great toting. The marlin is easy to take down, one screw, how many on the Winchester, 2 dozen??

the major is offline  
Old September 10th, 2004, 09:38 PM   #6
Squad Leader
 
glock armorer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kalistan
Posts: 236
I like the Marlin action (close) than the Winchester (open). I have both the 1894P and 1894 Trapper. IMHO the Marlins action is stronger than the Win. (Both in 44Mag.)

Gil

glock armorer is offline  
Old September 12th, 2004, 03:34 AM   #7
Platoon Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SF East Bay Area - California
Posts: 318
I had a 1895 Marlin that I gave to my brother when I began shooting the Sharps. I still load ammo for the Marlin though and it will digest anything that you would want to shoot more than once.

I've looked at the more recent production and really liked the stainless 1895 45-70 and their offerings with ballard style cut rifling. The old microgroove rifling did not float my boat. I am not a big fan of ported barrels in something like this, I just do not see the need. You are not going to shoot something like this day after day in matches so the exposure to the recoil is limited. It's a manually operated action so recovery from recoil can be done while the action is cycled.

Peep sights are the cats pajamas. I had a Williams Fool Proof on the 1895 and it worked great.

The Hodgdon #27 manual has some excellent loads for this rifle. You can also shoot the Barnes X bullets if you are careful to load them no more than two at a time (One in the chamber and one in the magazine)

All in all they are an excellent rifle if you accept the limitations of the cartridge and the 18 inch barrel. Even so you can load 300g bullets to over 2100fps and at close ranges that will put a world of hurt on anything you hit.

djl4570 is offline  
Old September 23rd, 2004, 06:23 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: directly over the planet's center
Posts: 227
Second'd that vote for the Marlin in 45-70. Solid gun. I use those Buf-Bores in a 45-70 Browing M85. I'm not a small guy, but without a 'sissy-bag', (as in pratice for hunting), a hand full of those 405grn is about all I'd care to shoot at one setting. They are not cheap, but they will do the job.

MtScout is offline  
Old October 15th, 2011, 02:42 PM   #9
Banned Camp
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: se florida 01/sot
Posts: 1,190
got a 16.5 inch stainless guide gun,still waiting to shoot it

dprice3844444 is offline  
Old October 15th, 2011, 07:51 PM   #10
Master Gunner
 
Lruss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 961
ok i searched many gunshows over
several years looking for my marlin.

in 1972 marlin brought back the 45-70
1895. that year and that year only the barrels
were deep cut ballard rifling made for cast
500 grain bullet's. the next year they went to
the micro groove and 300/405 grain bullet's.
now they have them with ballard rifling but
not cut long enough for a 500 grain bullet.

i found one very nice was $100 over bluebook
from man at gunshow but was ok with me
because i knew about the rifling and he did not.
turns out a year later in bluebook it went up $200
so was a very good buy. also i noticed other's
were now looking for that year after the new bluebook.
Lruss

Lruss is offline  
Old October 15th, 2011, 08:06 PM   #11
Scout Sniper
 
cachunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 782
+1 on the marlin, that thing is a beast

cachunk is offline  
Old October 15th, 2011, 08:15 PM   #12
Banned Camp
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: se florida 01/sot
Posts: 1,190
Sponsors of Leverguns.Com

T. Riekers Sporting Agency & Gun Works | Steve's Gunz | Henry Repeating Arms Co.
Montana Bullet Works | Gunblast.Com | Sixguns | The Art of John Dietz | Friends of Billy Dixon
Grizzly Cartridges | Cast Performance Bullets | Merit Corporation



Marlin's Microgroove Barrels
by Glen E. Fryxell

Before 1950 all Marlin barrels were made by drilling the bore, and then cutting the rifling one groove at a time on a sine-bar machine. This required multiple iterative passes of a cutting head for each groove (at first this was done with a "scrape cutter", and later a "hook cutter"). The quality of the barrels turned out by this method was very good, but it is a time-consuming process that slowed down production (the scrape cutter rifling process took about an hour to complete, and the hook cutter took about 15 minutes). Marlin likes to call this process "Ballard rifling" because this was how the barrels were cut on the Ballard target rifles that Marlin produced, which were famous for their accuracy. Most of Marlin's cut-rifled barrels from this period had 6 grooves, but Marlin also made 4-groove (some of their .30 and .32 caliber guns), 5-groove (.22 caliber) and 7-groove (.35 caliber) barrels.

For .22 caliber barrels, these grooves were generally in the range of .069-.090" wide (usually about .075"), and .0015-.003" deep (these specifications changed over time). For centerfire rifle barrels the grooves were .0785" to .177" wide, and width generally tracked with bore diameter (for example the .25-20 had grooves that were .0785" wide, while the .45-70 had grooves that were .141" wide). On the older centerfire rifles (i.e. pre-WWI), these grooves were typically cut .002-.0025" deep. However, on the post-WWII .30-30s the specifications called for grooves that were .004" deep, and for the .35 Remingtons, grooves that were .005" deep.

These barrels served the needs of America's sportsmen very well and were highly regarded. However, America was entering the "baby boom" years of the 1950s, with their unprecedented growth and opportunity, and America's manufacturers were looking for ways to speed up production to keep up with demand. Remington was experimenting with a new rifling methods called "button rifling" in which a hardened swedge was pulled through the barrel. In 1950 Marlin tested some of Remington's .22 barrels and studied the rifling method and found that it resulted in more uniform dimensions, better bore finish, longer tool life and much faster production time. Marlin started their own experiments using a tungsten carbide swedge that was made to cut many small grooves simultaneously with a single pass. Marlin could now rifle a barrel in 2-5 seconds, instead of 15-60 minutes. Wow!

In 1953 Marlin applied for a patent on Microgroove rifling (US Patent #3,100,358 was granted on Aug. 13, 1953). In this patent, Microgroove rifling was described as having 5 grooves for every 1/10th of an inch bore diameter, and that the driving side of each land would be "tangentially disposed" (i.e. beveled, presumably to prevent the accumulation of fouling). On July 29, 1953, Marlin introduced Microgroove rifling in their .22 rimfire barrels, with 16 grooves that were .014" wide, and nominally .0015" deep. In their 1954 catalog, they outlined numerous advantages that this new form of rifling had, including better accuracy, ease of cleaning, elimination of gas leakage, higher velocities and lower chamber pressures. They also mentioned "...a bore of greater than standard size..." in their discussion of how Microgroove rifling did not engrave (distort) a bullet jacket as deeply as conventional rifling. Hold that thought....

Marlin continued to experiment with Microgroove rifling in their centerfire barrels, primarily in the Model 322 chambered for the .222 Remington (the highest velocity round that Marlin chambered for). The results of this testing convinced the Marlin engineers that Microgroove rifling was indeed suitable for high-velocity centerfire rifles and in early 1956 Marlin announced that all of their high-powered rifles would henceforth be equipped with Microgroove rifling.

For the common centerfire calibers, the initial specifications (circa 1956) for Microgroove barrels were as follows:

.22 centerfire -- 16 grooves, .015" wide, .001" deep
.30 caliber -- 16 grooves, .030" wide and .002" deep (this would be changed in 1958 to 22 grooves .024" wide, and .002" deep; and then again in 1968 to 12 grooves, .040" wide, .0028" deep)
.32 caliber -- 16 grooves, .035" wide, and .0015" deep
.35 caliber -- 16 grooves, .040" wide, and .002" deep (this would be changed in 1968 to 12 grooves, .055" wide, .0028" deep)
Note that by conventional standards, all of these grooves are fairly shallow. Microgroove rifling makes up for this by having many lands/grooves to grip and spin the bullet.

In 1968, the .444 Marlin was introduced, and of course it had Microgroove rifling. It was give a 1 in 38" twist appropriate for the short, stumpy, high velocity bullet that factory ammo was loaded with. There were 12 grooves, .056" wide and .0045" deep. It is worth noting that the factory specifications called for the .444 Marlin to have a groove diameter of .433" (and a bore diameter of .424"), indicating that oversized bullets would be necessary for best accuracy when shooting cast bullets.

Also in the 1960s, Marlin introduced the .44 Magnum to the Model 336. This rifle was fitted with Microgroove barrels, containing 12 grooves that were .062" wide and .0043" deep. Factory specs for the .44 Magnum barrels also called for a 1 in 38" twist, but that this time nominal groove diameter was to be held to .4315", and a bore diameter of .4230", so oversized cast bullets are once again called for. It is interesting to note that given the difference in groove width, groove diameter and bore diameter, suggesting that the .44 Magnum barrels were produced using a separate process and tooling than were the .444 Marlin barrels.

In 1969 the .44 Magnum was used to re-introduce the Model 1894. Ten years later the .357 Magnum was added to the 1894 line. This easy-handling carbine was also made with Microgroove rifling. In this case it had 12 grooves, each of which was .055" wide and .003" deep, and had a 1 in 16" twist. The groove diameter specification was listed as .3577", so .358" cast bullets generally shoot just fine. Later (in 1987) the .41 Magnum was added to the Model 1894. The .41 Magnums had 12 grooves that were .072" wide and .0035" deep, with a 1 in 20" twist. Factory specifications for groove diameter is listed at .4107", but these barrels sometimes run a little bit larger than this.

In 1972, Marlin introduced the Model 1895 chambered in .45-70. Initially, these rifles were made with 8-groove Microgroove barrels, with grooves that were .060" wide and .003" deep. The next year this was changed to a 12-groove barrel, with the other specs remaining the same. Again, groove diameter is spec-ed out at .4587", so oversized cast bullets are called for in these guns. All of these .45-70 Microgroove barrels had a 1 in 20-" twist.

There has been a great deal of concern over the years about whether or not Microgroove rifling would shoot cast bullets well. One group of folks says that Microgroove rifles can't hit a barn from the inside with cast bullets, one group says that Microgroove barrels shoot cast just fine just so long as velocities are kept below 1600 fps, and one groups says that Microgroove barrels shoot cast just fine at full throttle. The key to success with cast bullets in a Marlin with Microgroove rifling is to keep in mind that these barrels tend to have oversized groove diameters, and that the grooves/lands are shallow. Therefore, in order to get proper engraving (and minimize "slippage" of the cast bullet as it enters the shallow rifling), it is necessary that the bullet completely fill up the groove diameter of the barrel, and engage the maximum amount of the driving surface of the lands. Since Microgroove barrels are commonly oversized, this means that the cast bullet must also be oversized to effectively "fill up" the grooves. Other factors that also contribute to good accuracy with cast bullet in Microgroove barrels are the use of a GC bullet (which helps to provide a better grip and seal), and making sure that bullet are cast hard enough for the application (generally a BHN of 12 or more). It is also worth remembering that throats in modern rifles are almost always cut larger than groove diameter of the barrel (to insure that ammunition can chamber easily), and that best cast bullet accuracy is obtained by fitting the bullet to the throat, hence reinforcing the need for oversized cast bullets in Microgroove barrels (for example, the throats on my .30-30s run almost .311", so I size cast bullets to .310" for these guns).

Examples of Microgroove barrels shooting cast bullets accurately are easy to find. For example, I have a Marlin 1894 in .41 Magnum that was made in the first production run about 20 years ago. I don't know the throat diameter on this gun, but it shoots it's best with .412" bullets. Bullets sized .410" don't shoot well at all, and while .411" bullets group so-so, they have a really annoying habit of throwing flyers wide of the group by a notable margin. In this levergun the NEI .410-260-GC (#215F) is the key to success. I cast these bullets to a BHN of 13, size them .412" and lube them with homemade moly lube. Loaded over 19.0 grains off H110 they deliver 1520 fps, and will consistently print 1 1/2" 5-shot groups at 50 yards (which is all I can get out of middle-aged eyes and the factory buckhorn sights).

Another example is found in the .35 Remington shooting the Lyman 358315 GC-HP (which weighs 206 grains as it drops from the blocks, when cast to a BHN of 13). Sized .359", checked with a Hornady crimp-on GC, and lubed with moly lube, a very accurate load is obtained by seating these bullets over 36.0 grains of H4895. This combination generates right at 2000 fps, and will routinely group 5 shots into an inch at 50 yards from a Microgroove Marlin 336. The cast HP expands violently at 2000 fps.

Other examples can be found in the .30-30, .32 Special, .444 Marlin, etc., but you get the point. Microgroove rifles can shoot cast bullets just fine -- just keep them oversized, GC-ed and hard enough.

Back in the late 1990s, with the rising popularity of cowboy action shooting and its emphasis on historical accuracy, a whole new group of shooters started picking up Marlin leverguns. Because of their desire to load cast bullets in them, and because of the on-going, nagging (and inaccurate) rumors of poor accuracy from Microgroove barrels, Marlin eventually caved in and dropped Microgroove rifling for a number of their leverguns in the late 1990s. Sales of the cowboy guns have been brisk (especially those chambered for period correct cartridges, like the .45 Colt and .45-70). Marlin helps to feed this nostalgia by referring to these guns as "Ballard rifled".

As of fall of 2007, Marlin still makes a number of guns that have Microgroove barrels on them (according to the 2007 Marlin catalog posted on their website; http://www.marlinfirearms.com/). All of their .22 LR and .22 Magnum rifles still have Microgroove barrels. The 336s in .30-30 and .35 Remington are still made with Microgroove barrels, however the stainless 336XLR in .30-30 and .35 Remington have Ballard rifled barrels. All of the big-bore Marlin leverguns (e.g. 444, 1895, etc.) are now fitted with Ballard rifled barrels (both blued and stainless guns), as are the 1894 and 1895 Cowboy models. Interestingly, in the 1894 series, the.44 Magnum and .357 Magnum guns are Ballard rifled, but the .32-20 1894CL and .41 Magnum 1894 FG are both fitted with Microgroove barrels.

Microgroove rifling is a fascinating, and misunderstood, innovation by one of America's leading armsmakers. It speeds up production time and significantly extends the service life of the tooling (thereby holding production costs down). It provides very uniform bore dimensions and a very smooth bore finish. And the bottom line is, as generations of American hunters can testify to, Microgroove rifling provides fine accuracy in the hunting fields. Because of the specifications adopted by Marlin, Microgroove barrels tend to have oversized groove diameters, and as a result, Microgroove barrels early on earned a reputation for not shooting cast bullets well. In fact, when loaded with bullets that are the appropriate size for the barrel (and cast to a suitable hardness and wearing a GC), these guns are capable of fine accuracy with cast bullets. Some of my favorite cast bullet rifles wear Microgroove barrels.

The historical data used in this article was taken in large part from William S. Brophy's book "Marlin Firearms: A History of the Guns and the Company That Made Them". For more information on Marlin firearms, this extraordinary book is highly recommended.







Home
Articles

Leverguns Forum

Leverguns Safari 2006

Leverguns at Home & in the Field

Lever & Handgun's CD

Acu'rizer Tool

Scrimshaw By Twyla

Leversmiths

Exploded Views

Winchester Resources

Marlin Resources

Chamber & Cartridge Dimensions

Current Levergun Makers

About Leverguns

Mail List

Contact Leverguns

Desktops

Site Info

The 480 Achilles

Thanks from hero4you69 and jens5
dprice3844444 is offline  
Old October 15th, 2011, 09:14 PM   #13
Master Gunner
 
Lruss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 961
Quote:
mod 1895 45-70 gov mfg. 1972-1978

early new model marlins had cut rifling
suitable for cast bullets. while later mfg. was
switched to micro groove rifling. changes were
also made from a straight stock to a pistol grip
stock and from a traditional receiver to one with
the newer hammer block push button safety.
early guns with straight grip stock,traditional
receiver and cut rifling command a premiums
over later mfg. cut rifling occurred during the
first year of production only these guns have
a ser. no. prefix of B.O.
add 10% for guns mfg. 1972-1978
add 10% for pre micro groove

blue book of gun values 2008
Lruss

Lruss is offline  
Old October 24th, 2011, 07:07 PM   #14
Lifer
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,029
Here is a "hint" that will save you a ton of money.

Just buy the version of the Marlin Guide Gun you like the best, and fit it with the sights you like the best.

My brother and my brother in law both have Marlin Guide Guns.

They are very accurate, much more so than necessary.

NE450N02 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2011, 10:03 AM   #15
Master Gunner
 
MesaRifle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 914
Caution, Will Robinson, Caution!

But... as has been discussed at length on another thread here, the recent (post-Remington take-over) Marlins have had some very significant quality issues, like the accuracy and dimensional accuracy of their various bbl dovetail cuts (too large; stuff falls out!), their bbl accuracy (used to see 1.2"5 shot groups with the 45-70, but now they are shipping some that won't do even 3". More like 4" to 5". At 100 yds! Oh-oh!

We gunsmiths have re-named them gRemlins or Marlingtons out of a "deep respect" for their newly established bad quality.

The late summer news release from Remington was that they were stopping production of all centerfire lever guns until they worked out those issues. I'd be a bit leary of buying anything from Marlin right now, or that was made post-2007 takeover until this has all been worked out.

One of my customers has now decided to sell his one-year-old Marlin Cowboy which would simply not shoot with any degree of acceptable accuracy (best out of box was 5 shots 6" @ 90 yds, if I recall...), despite a trip to Marlin's custom shop, and my own careful gunsmithing/accurizing ministrations on literally everything I could think of, including special handload developments.

So now, he's seriously considering the Winchester 1886 "short rifle" lever gun, which is, yeah, made by Miroku, a no-nonsense quality builder out of Japan, but nonetheless, my 1892 saddle-ring carbine, also built by them, is a very high quality piece, and it shoots very well. (Hey... ever hear of Nikon cameras?). I think the 1886 Winny also sports a US-made Badger bbl, which could be a real plus.

http://www.winchesterguns.com/produc...24C&mid=534175

BTW, Winchester have also re-intro'd the Model 71 Winnie in... you guessed it... .348 Winchester, that great old Alaskan favorite cartridge, which was often wildcatted to a bunch of real bear stoppers "in the day"!!

Not that, with some of the new 45-70 loads, you'd ever need such stuff. Just load up some 1900 fps heavy-jacketed 400 grain Belt Mountain "Punch" bullets, and drop that bruin!

http://beltmountain.com/punch.htm

MesaRifle is offline  
Reply

  M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Lever Action



Search tags for this page
.375 win vs 45-70
,
45 70 scout rifle
,
45-70 high boy winchester
,
45-70 scout
,

45-70 scout rifle

,
45/70 marlin scout rifle
,
hunting with a winchester .45-70
,
marlin 1895 scout set up
,
marlin 45 70 sights or scout rifle
,
marlin 45-70 .45 70
,
marlin scout sniper rifle
,
original price of 1954 marlin midel 322 .222
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Moderator Tools
Display Modes


Similar M14 Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All Army Winning Teams 1970-2000 IC2(SS)19Z50C5 Rifle Competition 3 October 13th, 2012 07:53 PM
Springfield M1A Scout Squad Rifle Set addiction Bargains 0 October 15th, 2010 01:26 PM
Springfield Scout Squad rifle or SOCOM 16 Raven67 The M14 14 April 1st, 2005 05:34 PM
Vintage rifle match in NC! Jeremy2171 The M14 1 February 28th, 2005 07:24 PM



Top Gun Sites Top Sites List