February 20th, 2012, 11:38 AM
|
#16 |
| Lifer
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,181
| Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC6094 dozier The HP switched because the Beretta pistols they switched to in 2006 or 2007 were proving problematic. They went to the Sig and havent had a single issue since.
In my agencies case, we switched to Gen 4 Glock 22's and traded in our mixed bag off Gen 2 and 3 Glocks even for Gen 4's.
ALE is an entity unto itself and their reasoning baffles the rest of the LEO's in this state. Most of us local LEO types think it was so theyd have a cool pistol to go with their state badge.
As for other departments trading in for something else, thats up to them and the Boards of Commissioners they answer to. Maybe its wasteful, maybe it fits their budgetary needs, I cant speak for them, but I wont second guess something I'm not privy too.
Just say'n and I'm not trying to stir anything up, but consider ALE is a state agency, and they have alot more money to play with than a city PD like I work for. | Doing a little research and asking around other PD's that are using the weapons already would keep them from buying something that has problems. Having a "cool" gun at the range doesn't solve the problem of taxpayers having to fund the purchase. dozier
|
| |