Smart gun article WTF - M14 Forum

M14 Forum


Smart gun article WTF

This is a discussion on Smart gun article WTF within the Gun Rights forums, part of the Gun Forum category; WTF is wrong with people, I hope this writer hasn't populated the gene pool CNN) -- Voices across the political spectrum are debating how to ...


Go Back   M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Gun Rights

10Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old January 11th, 2013, 12:58 PM   #1
Automatic Rifleman
 
Buckingfastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: East of the Rockies, west of the rest
Posts: 144
Smart gun article WTF

WTF is wrong with people, I hope this writer hasn't populated the gene pool


CNN) -- Voices across the political spectrum are debating how to prevent mass shootings such as the one in Newtown, Connecticut. Familiar ideological lines are being redrawn. Some want to renew the ban on assault weapons and expand waiting periods to buy a gun. Others want to place armed guards in schools. And then there is the challenge of preventing guns from falling into the hands of the mentally ill.

While the debate rages on, it's worth thinking out of the box for a moment. What if we could design guns to be smarter and safer -- with hardware and software? The right technology could neutralize the killing capability of an assault weapon, even in a madman's hands.

The root of the problem is that guns are "dumb." Pull the trigger and they discharge bullets mindlessly, regardless of who is doing the aiming or where they are aimed. Guns should "know" not to fire in schools, churches, hospitals or malls. They should sense when they are being aimed at a child, or at a person when no other guns are nearby.

Hardware fixes alone -- such as a ban on extended clips -- may mitigate carnage in an assault, but they will not change the risk that an event happens at all if the person holding the gun wants to harm others. Addressing that challenge with reliable precision requires a hardware and software solution.

Many complex products have been transformed by safety-enhancing technology. Look at airplanes, which have layers of computer-controlled safety features to temper pilot error. Cars, increasingly, have sophisticated controls to override drivers and avoid collisions. Guns, too, can benefit from technological advances.

After the Newtown shooting, a number of Silicon Valley leaders signed the "Demand a Plan" petition for new gun laws. It is good to know how strongly they feel about tougher regulation. It would be even better if they would invest their know-how and wealth to create a new kind of gun control -- the software kind.

How might this work? Start with locational "self-awareness." Guns should know where they are and if another gun is nearby. Global positioning systems can meet most of the need, refining a gun's location to the building level, even within buildings. Control of the gun would remain in the hand of the person carrying it, but the ability to fire multiple shots in crowded areas or when no other guns are present would be limited by software that understands where the gun is being used.

Guns should also be designed to sense where they are being aimed. Artificial vision and optical sensing technology can be adapted from military and medical communities. Sensory data can be used by built-in software to disable firing if the gun is pointed at a child or someone holding a child.

Building software into guns need not affect gun owners' desire to protect their homes. Trigger control software could be relaxed when the gun is at home or in a car, while other safety features stay on to prevent accidental discharges. Guns used by the police would be exempt from such controls.

Finally, guns should be designed to broadcast their location when they are loaded. Police could see if high-powered assault weapons are entering or getting close to a public place. Gun owners, too, could choose to broadcast their guns' locations publicly to increase deterrent effect.

Couldn't gun software be hacked? Perhaps, but the risk can be reduced by open-sourcing code, requiring software patch downloads, and notifying gun makers or law enforcement if software is disabled. Open-sourcing code is not foolproof, but it will build a community of lawful gun owners and code writers who value safety and Second Amendment rights. Enabling two-way communication between guns and their original makers will help guns to be tracked beyond the initial sale, putting greater long-term responsibility on gun makers.

Developing gun software and hardware adaptations could be hastened through a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency-style program. This Defense Department agency tries to solve difficult warfare challenges with cutting-edge ideas. It gave us GPS, among other things. In the private sector, rewards can be offered for specific technological achievements, such as what the X Prize Foundation has been doing. Gun makers, gun retailers, even the National Rifle Association could underwrite a similar prize.

Gun software could be phased in, starting with the most lethal assault rifles. Today's guns are componentized, creating possibilities for a vibrant aftermarket, with add-ons tested and certified by a consortium of gun makers or responsible gun owners.

Technology cannot end depravity or violence, but it can limit the evil a person can inflict on others. After this latest heart-wrenching massacre, enacting new laws may help us feel like we have done something. But smarter technology may actually do a lot more.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/09/opinio...html?hpt=hp_t2



Buckingfastard is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:04 PM   #2
Old Salt
 
mknopfler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Socialist State of Boulder, Co
Posts: 1,437

Awards Showcase

Fairy Dust !!

Thanks from csacpt and m14nm
mknopfler is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:04 PM   #3
Cranky Old Vietnam Vet
 
CAVman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WYoming
Posts: 10,649

Awards Showcase

I particularly liked his statement:

"Sensory data can be used by built-in software to disable firing if the gun is pointed at a child or someone holding a child."

Wow...

A whole new definition of 'stupid'...

Our Troops and our SWAT Snipers would really like to hear about that software...



CAVman in WYoming

CAVman is offline  
 
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:08 PM   #4
Old Salt
 
Flanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 1,449
This actually makes a lot of sense... Guns can only be fired at paper at designated by satellite ranges. Perfectly safe. I like the part about the knowing the presence of other firearms part.

This is actually even 'less intelligent' then the no guns at all argument. Just goes to prove that people who are ignorant on a subject (firearms, AND history ) shouldnt be the ones thinking to fix a problem.

Flanders is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:10 PM   #5
Old Salt
 
ericscher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Millersport, Ohio
Posts: 1,532
In fairness, he DID grow up in a culture that trained him to believe that there is no problem that cannot be solved by technology.

It's still a dumbass idea, but it did come from somewhere.

ericscher is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:13 PM   #6
Lifer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,604
Did this originate from the Onion?

Thanks from mknopfler
Swamp Rat is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:17 PM   #7
Platoon Sergeant
 
AirConda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 373
I say let him have is dream and hopefully the libs will follow suit. It at least will keep them distracted for a couple of years. Buying us more time haha.

AirConda is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:18 PM   #8
Platoon Sergeant
 
Johnnycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tupelo, Mississippi
Posts: 322
Sensory data can be used by built-in software to disable firing if the gun is pointed at a child or someone holding a child.


What if you are being attacked by an armed dwarf?

Thanks from GARRARD, m14nm, meterman and 1 others
Johnnycat is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:27 PM   #9
In the gilded halls of Valhala
 
Dredsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,516
interesting idea.

unfortunatly i don't think we should be paying 10,000.00 per gun.

he also forgets that the 2nd amendment won't be protected if the government can hack into your gun and shut it off.

Dredsen is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 01:52 PM   #10
Platoon Sergeant
 
Maximus14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 350
It just proves that people are getting creative. Both sides are getting creative the pros and the antis. I hate to say it but there might just be something good that comes out of this. For example if I got an email alert that my pistol had left my house 5 minutes before my kid left for school I think that would be okay.

Maximus14 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 02:01 PM   #11
Old Salt
 
csacpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Republic of Texas Ingram
Posts: 1,223
Apparently this sort are not acquainted with Murphy and his laws!

csacpt is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 02:04 PM   #12
Rifleman
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pa
Posts: 43
What if you are wearing a tin foil hat? Will that interfear with this "smartgun" technology? I think this guy has spent too much time in front of his laptop, video gamer,?

taxpayer is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 02:34 PM   #13
Fire Team Leader
 
Kylsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 201
I don't think this idea is born of stupidity, rather ignorance, because on its surface this idea isn't entirely terrible or born of malicious intent. It's an idea that could work, if there wasn't that whole "reality" thing, complete with criminals and other entities that would ignore, adapt and exploit that system.

Thanks from Buckingfastard
Kylsix is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 02:44 PM   #14
Platoon Sergeant
 
Johnnycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tupelo, Mississippi
Posts: 322
It reminds me of the people that want individual pistols to print their serial numbers on brass as they are ejected so that it will be easier to solve crimes. It can't be that hard to do, right?

Johnnycat is offline  
Old January 11th, 2013, 02:56 PM   #15
Old Salt
 
RandyB45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 1,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swamp Rat View Post
Did this originate from the Onion?
My guess is Sandia National Labs. They were working on a transponder to disable security force guns if it crossed over a force member, back in the late 90s.

It failed the laugh test.

RandyB45 is offline  
Reply

  M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Gun Rights


Search tags for this page

computer gun

,

smart gun pros

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Moderator Tools
Display Modes


Similar M14 Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AK-47’s for America’s Enemies, Gun Control for American Citizens TampaSsgt Gun Rights 4 July 29th, 2012 01:41 AM
EPA Shutting Down Gun Range in Large Midwestern Town thomastred Gun Rights 0 May 22nd, 2009 03:48 PM
GOA Alert: As Senate Reconvenes... Veterans Disarmament Bill Offers False Hopes Lambo Gun Rights 0 September 6th, 2007 10:57 AM
Col. Mitchel Paige US Marine Corps Hawk Wall of Honor 6 July 18th, 2004 12:57 PM
Gun Owners of America e-mail Jefferson F. Davis Gun Rights 1 March 3rd, 2004 10:25 AM



Top Gun Sites Top Sites List