M14 Forum


Go Back   M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Full Automatics


Like Tree1Thanks
  • 1 Post By bd111

Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old January 28th, 2011, 08:34 AM   #1
Master Gunner
 
boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson,Ky
Posts: 925
Question Wonder Why ?

Wonder Why ? No one builds a M3 Grease Gun today. (In semi auto)

They say they were cheap to build , but dependable weapons.

Looks like some gun maker would give it a try.

I know I would buy one if priced reasonable.

Boomer

boomer is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 28th, 2011, 09:10 PM   #2
Lifer
 
GARRARD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tampa
Posts: 3,290
Post

Interesting idea. Never crossed my mind before.

GARRARD is online now  
Old January 28th, 2011, 10:46 PM   #3
Lifer
 
7.62bthp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montgomery County TEXAS
Posts: 3,362
Well....It would have to be a complete redesign as the originals are open bolt. MAC was successful as was UZI in reconfiguring their open bolt weps, I don't know about the Greaser. You're right, they are cool. There is a semi Sten out now so what the hey.

7.62bthp is offline  
Old January 28th, 2011, 11:20 PM   #4
Designated Marksman
 
nicholst55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 557
Somebody at least was making them at one time; don't know if they still are.

Here we go, Valkyrie Arms.

nicholst55 is offline  
Old January 29th, 2011, 01:27 PM   #5
Lifer
 
GARRARD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tampa
Posts: 3,290
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicholst55 View Post
Somebody at least was making them at one time; don't know if they still are.

Here we go, Valkyrie Arms.
Not anymore. They are only accepting orders for the DeLisle Commando Carbine.

GARRARD is online now  
Old April 15th, 2011, 10:27 AM   #6
Snappin In
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West Upstate NY , USA
Posts: 15
The '86 ban takes out 95% of the reason for them. Cheap and full auto was THE reason they existed. Attractive? No. More accurate than other semi auto .45 carbines? No. Designed with 16" barrel or look even close to appropriate with one? No. We've really lost a lot because of that stupid 922(o) law for no gain at all.

yellowfin is offline  
Old February 13th, 2012, 01:09 AM   #7
Snappin In
 
Sarge 13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 30
Back in the 90s there were 2 semi variants made - by 2 different mfgrs. One was a pistol with the stock weldded closed and the other was a carbine/16" bbl and workable stock. Neither one was around for more than 5 yrs, I can only guess why. The parent gun was a P.O.S.! I owned one till someone offered me about $100 more than I thought it was worth - BY, BY!
Sarge

Sarge 13 is offline  
Old March 5th, 2012, 12:11 PM   #8
Designated Marksman
 
Earthquake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 578
I would like to have one of those De Lisle carbine though, suppressed or not I dont care.

Casey

Earthquake is offline  
Old March 5th, 2012, 12:24 PM   #9
Lifer
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 2,585
I can't give you an answer that'll satisfy you. There are stamped .45's and 9's, even .380's, in the marketplace that look like the Ingram or the SWD. Some of the .45's USED to accept grease gun magazines without a hiccup. Later production = use the mfr's magazine or modify (with a file or Dremel) a grease gun magazine to fit. All I've been able to GUESS (speculate) is that magazine capacity became an issue for the mfr in its relations with govt authority and it wasn't considered cost-effective to make the firearm one way for, say, CA, and another way for, say, AZ.

Thanks from CAVman
bd111 is offline  
Reply

  M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Full Automatics


Moderator Tools
Display Modes




Top Gun Sites Top Sites List /m14forum @m14forum RSS Feed