September 14th, 2011, 09:52 AM
|
#31 |
| Master Gunner
Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Canada
Posts: 873
| Quote:
Originally Posted by M14 Very nice collection. How did you come by all them?
Yes, I did find Ontario's link last night and noted they make several GSA issue knives. I doubt I will find a MkII like yours for a reasonable price, and even then, I'm not sure if I would want to use it or hange it on the wall to stare at it. The new Ontario GSA issue may be more for me.
Any ideas why the KBAR type knives are better fighters than say a similar sized Bayonet? | Quote:
Originally Posted by 2336USMC Boy you could start a whole debate with that one.
You could fill a room with knife fighting "experts" and probably no two of them would agree on what is the "best" fighting knife.
If you look at them the M5/M6/M7 bayonet blades are very similar to the old Sykes-Fairbairn type knives which are considered classic fighting knives. I'm sure that a guy that knows what he's doing could fight very well with one.
Some obvious differences between the Kabar and the bayonet are the Kabar has a heavier blade and a much more forward weight balance which should give more powerful strokes and more cutting power than an M5/6/7 bayonet, which tends to feel butt heavy with the balance almost in the palm of the hand. This may or may not be a factor in one's fighting style.
Also the Kabar has the point of the blade off-center while the bayonets are centered. Again depending on fighting style some think this is a big deal for thrusts. | My received wisdom is that bayonets are made to bend if necessary and then be straightenable afterwards. I've noticed that every time I lay eyes on an unfamiliar bayonet, my first thought is 'what a great knife!'. But then I suspect that the softer steel will mean that they are not as shapenable as a modern knife, nor as usable.
|
| |