Ruger Precision Rifle - Page 7 - M14 Forum

M14 Forum


Ruger Precision Rifle

This is a discussion on Ruger Precision Rifle within the Bolt Action forums, part of the Gun Forum category; Originally Posted by TNcoupe Yep....still waiting for mine. TNcoupe did you get your RPR in yet? I put one on order (.308) late last week ...


Go Back   M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Bolt Action

89Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old November 10th, 2015, 04:42 PM   #91
Lifer
 
Stevie Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Florida's Treasure Coast
Posts: 2,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNcoupe View Post
Yep....still waiting for mine.
TNcoupe did you get your RPR in yet?

I put one on order (.308) late last week and the LGS doesn't have a clue when one may come in, 'Could be tomorrow, could be a couple of months'. Think I'm going with another Nightforce scope on this one, I really like the NF NXS 3.5-15x50 on one of my bolt rifles and may go with another one for the RPR.

Stevie Ray is offline  
Remove Ads
Old November 10th, 2015, 05:03 PM   #92
Old Salt
 
TNcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Decatur, TN
Posts: 1,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevie Ray View Post
TNcoupe did you get your RPR in yet?

I put one on order (.308) late last week and the LGS doesn't have a clue when one may come in, 'Could be tomorrow, could be a couple of months'. Think I'm going with another Nightforce scope on this one, I really like the NF NXS 3.5-15x50 on one of my bolt rifles and may go with another one for the RPR.
Nope, I got on the waiting list at Sportsmans WH awhile back. Ive since given up on it. I bought a Rock Creek heavy varmint profile barrel, Jewell trigger, KRG chassis, and going to buy a Defiance or Bighorn TL2 action in a couple weeks to do a custom bolt rifle. Tired of waiting on the Ruger and read a few stories about bad QC with the first run. I'll pick one up eventually.

Thanks from Stevie Ray
TNcoupe is offline  
Old November 10th, 2015, 09:35 PM   #93
Banned Camp
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jacksonville, TX
Posts: 4,039

Awards Showcase

Quote:
Originally Posted by Planoguy View Post
Yeah, the recent trend seems to be marketing these modern super adjustable, tactical stocks. It'll be interesting to see a range report....
...and I guess you can crack walnuts with it, or press juice from fruit if you ever get bored with shooting.

RetiredNSmilin308 is offline  
 
Old November 10th, 2015, 11:59 PM   #94
Rifleman
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: S. Cal.
Posts: 44
I could have had one in .243 about a month ago, but want one in .308. Guess I'll have to wait a year or two. I'm not up to "par" on my M1A yet, so I have something to occupy the time while I wait.

Nice from what I can tell from here. Have fun.

jhod is offline  
Old November 24th, 2015, 05:49 PM   #95
Rifleman
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 45
FINALLY got to shoot my (well, loaner for an upcoming school) .308 today. What a blast! Can't wait to wring it out over the next couple of weeks. Vortex gen 1 Razor was super easy to match up to it, too. I see what all the excitement is about. Darned accurate--literally right outa the box.

Thanks from Stevie Ray
im1livewire is offline  
Old November 24th, 2015, 10:32 PM   #96
Lifer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,337
Saw one in .308 today in my LGS. By a coincidence, I also sold my DPMS LR308B today, so I had cash burning a hole in my pocket.

I loved the side folder mechanism but as mentioned elsewhere, the Samson rail was not close to centered. This one was off to the left.

Slightly tempted but I bought another 10/22 instead.
Will probably buy another one or two Chinese M14s this week.
Different strokes for different folks ...

Lazerus2000 is offline  
Old November 25th, 2015, 03:43 AM   #97
Old Salt
 
TNcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Decatur, TN
Posts: 1,144
Still no call about mine. Im over it.

TNcoupe is offline  
Old November 25th, 2015, 08:40 PM   #98
Old Salt
 
swagbrdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 1,499
My pop has one in a 243. Loves it.

swagbrdr is offline  
Old November 26th, 2015, 07:52 AM   #99
Platoon Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 357
off center rail, not a big deal???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lennyo3034 View Post
I got mine in yesterday and spent a good amount of time messing with it to give a detailed first impressions:

Overall I really like this rifle, however this first impression review may sound critical of it because it's easier to explain bad things than good. I should also mention that I'm manufacturing engineer, and while I don't specialize in any particular process used in this rifle, I still have an eye for some things.



Its clear that Ruger designed this rifle with this price point in mind. Some people might call this "cutting corners", but in this case I think Ruger did an analysis of where they can cut costs with the least impact to performance.

I'll start with the barrel: I cleaned the barrel with butch's bore shine and was able to get an impression on how smooth and consistent it was. Ruger's decision to use the hammer forging process to make these barrels makes absolute sense in my opinion. They already had the forging equipment and only had to buy dies and smaller tooling, which while not cheap is a fraction of the cost of the forging equipment. I would guess Ruger can forge these barrels for 1/5 to 1/10 the cost of outsourcing the blanks from a third party manufacturer. I'll note this is purely speculation on my part, but not a total WAG based on what I know about operating costs. The accuracy of Ruger's CHF barrels is still to be determined, but FN (SPR bolt gun) and Remington (5R line) used CHF barrels in their bolt guns that are very accurate. While cleaning the barrel, it was apparent that Ruger did not lap the bore to the level that you would expect from a high end custom barrel maker. Patches simply did not go down as smoothly as with the Krieger .260 barrel that I was cleaning at the same time. Not that the Ruger was bad, about what is expected from a factory barrel, maybe slightly better. That being said the bore is very consistent which is much more important than being super smooth. The pressure required to push the patch through is consistent, better than some button rifled match barrels I'd had, which may have been a result of inconsistent rifling or bore diameter. From a cost vs expected performance perspective, I think Ruger made the right call. I wish the barrel had a slightly thicker contour, but I'm not sure if that was a design decision made by Ruger, or if that's the thickest their hammer forge was capable of doing since it requires a lot more pressure for a slight increase in thickness.

I think the design of the action is brilliant. I didn't go as far as taking off the barrel, but I do like how it is attached to the rifle. I really like how everything from the barrel to the receiver to the stock is all on the same axis. From a load path standpoint, that is brilliant and probably my favorite thing about the rifle. Once custom shops get their hands on them, I'm hoping to find out whether or not the actions need truing like Remingtons. The machining on the action is not the best. The inside bore of the receiver has some chatter marks, probably from dull tooling. This affects how smooth the bolt slides forward and backwards, but had no effect on real performance. The bolt is not super tight in the receiver like some custom actions which makes sense for this rifle. They can save money via looser tolerances that way, as well as have an action that is less affected by dirt and debris. The bolt locks up nice and solid though, which is what really matters. The end result is an action that doesn't feel super refined, but is very functional.

The bolt is something I'm undecided on. I'm a bit surprised they didn't go with a floating bolt head. It would make the receiver being perfectly true less important. Seems like it would be cheaper that way with the same or better accuracy. But I wasn't on Ruger's design team and I'm sure they had their reasons. Without knowing what they knew, I can't knock them on that. I'm not sure why the bolt needs two cocking ramps on the back of it as that's just more machine time, however I'm sure they had their reasons. There are a few things I dislike about the bolt though. The finish on mine was not very smooth. A relatively rough finish on bare metal like that is just asking for corrosion, stainless or not. I ended spending about an hour polishing the bolt by hand with a microfiber cloth and flitz metal polish. It smoothened the bolt body to be nice and slick to prevent corrosion as well as ride smoother in the receiver. I did not touch the locking lugs. I'm not really a fan of the bolt shroud as it feels cheap and flimsy on the bolt. I plan to order a backup shroud as I don't forsee this one lasting the life of the rifle.

I have nothing but praise for the buttstock and folding mechanism. Perfect and well thought out in my opinion. If they sell these in the aftermarket, I may get one for my AR-15 (minus the folding ability). I really like how there is a feature to cant the buttstock to better fit the shoulder pocket. It really shows that Ruger was paying attention.

The trigger is serviceable, but nothing special in my opinion. I'm not a particular fan of the accutrigger in Savages so I may be biased here. I've learned to treat the safety like the first stage of a two-stage trigger, although it doesn't feel quite as nice as one. The trigger pull itself has a good amount of creep before it breaks. Luckily this creep is extremely smooth. I would compare the trigger pull to similar to a Geissele 3-gun trigger where you pull through smoothly until it just breaks without hitting a second stage wall. Obviously it doesn't move nearly as much as the 3G trigger before breaking, but a similar feeling. It's certainly not my favorite trigger, but it's not bad and some people may prefer it. Once aftermarket triggers come out for it, I will take price into account before buying. One thing I was particularly impressed with was the design of the trigger weight adjustment. The screw stops on both sides of the adjustment range to tell you not to overturn it. The way they made the stops is cheap and effective. I've seen adjustable set screws where the hole where the spring rides is slightly smaller than the tapped hole for the set screw. That way the set screw will stop on the second hole instead of compressing the spring too far. This is a very effective way to do it, however it requires drilling twice. Ruger simply put a ring of locktite on the screw near the base so the user can feel when it's getting to the limit of adjust the pull on the heavy side. To adjust the screw to lighten the trigger, the user must turn the screw out. Instead of an internal stop to prevent the screw going out too far, they just designed it so the screw stops on the inside of the lower receiver. I don't know why I was so impressed with that, it extremely simple and effective. I should note that because of this DO NOT try to adjust the trigger with the lower receiver off.

The magazine cycled with the included Pmag as well as several of the M14 mags I had lying around. It did not like the Vietnam era mags quite as much as new production mags. The older USGI mags tend to be tighter fitting in my M14s and M1a making it just too tight for the Ruger. This is not a real concern to me as the USGI mags costs considerably more and are more collector items now anyways.

My least favorite part about this rifle is the Samson rail. I do not like the thermal bushing system, and the handguard to barrel nut attachment just does not seem to be very solid. Mine came off center like this one:

I ended up taking off the rail and thermal bushings, reinstalling them and it centered from left to right. However the rail is still not centered vertically and the barrel looks like it droops (although its really the rail going upwards). Whats more alarming is that when I apply pressure to the rail and barrel to correct it, it actually moves slightly. Then when I put it back on the bipod it goes back to it's droop. This tells me the rail to barrel nut interface is not very solid. My Diamondhead VRS-T, BCM KMR, and SLR rails do not do this as they are completely solid on the barrel nut. This could be due to the fact that they use a proprietary barrel nut instead of a standard one, but I'm willing to bet some rails that use a standard barrel nut are more solid than this. I am currently considering other rails that use the stock barrel nut to replace the Samson as I do not wish to remove the barrel nut. The one advantage to the Samson (and I suspect the reason Ruger choose that rail) is that the barrel nut does not have to be perfectly timed as the thermal bushings allow some flexibility for the rail mount. Obviously this applies to the RPR only as it will have to be timed perfectly on an AR-15 due to the gas tube. If my barrel nut is not perfectly timed (and it may not be as it's not necessary), then I'm SOL and stuck with the samson unless I want to remove or time the barrel nut.

These are my initial impressions from messing with the rifle yesterday. I am waiting on optics and muzzle brake (Vias) before I can take it shooting for a range report. Overall I am very happy with the rifle. I think Ruger made some very intelligent decisions to get the rifle down to the price point it is being offered at. I'm actually quite impressed with the amount of thought that went into it from the manufacturing side. Of course none of these points matter that much compared to performance and accuracy, which I have not yet tested.
Could someone explain to me why an off center rail upon which one mounts his scope is not a major issue on a rifle meant to shoot accurately at long ranges??I am sure it must be obvious, so be gentle in educating this old guy! Thanks gentleman.

big bear is offline  
Old November 26th, 2015, 07:56 AM   #100
Grunt
 
Defender3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by big bear View Post
Could someone explain to me why an off center rail upon which one mounts his scope is not a major issue on a rifle meant to shoot accurately at long ranges??I am sure it must be obvious, so be gentle in educating this old guy! Thanks gentleman.
The scope is mounted on the top of the receiver, which is not the handguard that people have been referring to as being off center. Was that gentle enough? :)

Thanks from big bear
Defender3 is offline  
Old November 26th, 2015, 08:19 AM   #101
Old Salt
 
hardheaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Home PA
Posts: 1,536
I had eyes on one in 6.5 yesterday at my LGS hangout
I have a hard time pushing the buy it now lever due to my
Last Ruger purchase a mini 14 that shoots a consistent
7-9 moa@ 100 yds scoped

hardheaded is offline  
Old November 27th, 2015, 05:25 AM   #102
Platoon Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 357
thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defender3 View Post
The scope is mounted on the top of the receiver, which is not the handguard that people have been referring to as being off center. Was that gentle enough? :)
Thanks, I thought it was a rail for scope mounting! Bad news, now I want to buy one!

big bear is offline  
Old November 27th, 2015, 05:28 AM   #103
In the gilded halls of Valhala
 
Dredsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,516
is a samson rail as easy to recenter as other ar rails ??

if bcm or odin makes a magnesium .38 13" rail id have that barrel fluted and add the lighter rail.

also youvdont really need a cheek piece with an ar type reciever so you could likely replace that stock with a ace buffer.

i like everything lighter now because of my health though. heft is usually good in PRS

Dredsen is offline  
Old December 30th, 2015, 04:18 PM   #104
Lifer
 
Stevie Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Florida's Treasure Coast
Posts: 2,555
My LGS has my .308 RPR coming in tomorrow and I'll be picking it up Saturday morning, I've been kinda reconsidering even getting one but after speaking with a couple of folks at my range who have shot them and telling me how much they really liked the rifle I decided to go ahead and keep my name on the list ... which fortunately happened to be numero uno out of four.

I'll throw a couple of pics up whenever I get it if y'all want to take a gander

Stevie Ray is offline  
Old December 30th, 2015, 04:49 PM   #105
Old Salt
 
TNcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Decatur, TN
Posts: 1,144
Double post

TNcoupe is offline  
Reply

  M14 Forum > Gun Forum > Bolt Action


Search tags for this page
308 ruger precision rifle for sale
,
m1a vs ruger precision rifle
,
ruger 308 precision rifle for sale
,
ruger precision
,
ruger precision forum
,

ruger precision rifle

,
ruger precision rifle canada
,

ruger precision rifle for sale

,
ruger precision rifle forum
,
ruger precision rifle forums
,
ruger precision rifle vs sako trg22
,
rugerprecisionforums
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Moderator Tools
Display Modes


Similar M14 Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LRB Arms serial number database Different Reference 195 August 2nd, 2015 02:47 PM
You have to read this ribs55 Steel and Wood 11 February 4th, 2015 07:15 PM
Precision Rifle Shoot Willie_Maker Pacific Northwest 7 December 14th, 2012 08:24 AM
Krag rifle, what should I expect? 762x51shooter Steel and Wood 12 June 8th, 2011 06:49 PM
Data base - M1A under sn 004600 Different Devine M1A 15 September 15th, 2007 10:00 AM



Top Gun Sites Top Sites List