(05) M118LR: good? bad? recipes? - M14 Forum

M14 Forum


(05) M118LR: good? bad? recipes?

This is a discussion on (05) M118LR: good? bad? recipes? within the Ammunition forums, part of the M14 M1A Forum category; During my brief survey of M1A ammo, I found M118LR. Some reviews are quite favorable, while others are quite derogatory. Assuming that both are correct, ...


Go Back   M14 Forum > M14 M1A Forum > Ammunition

11Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Moderator Tools Display Modes

Old February 19th, 2013, 05:05 PM   #1
Snappin In
 
Kirk A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 32
(05) M118LR: good? bad? recipes?

During my brief survey of M1A ammo, I found M118LR. Some reviews are quite favorable, while others are quite derogatory. Assuming that both are correct, when was the transition from good to bad?

I picked up a small quantity recently, and won't have the opportunity to test for awhile. The headstamp on mine reads "LC 05 LR". Please tell me, what can I expect from this ammo?

Many threads discussed the availability for this ammo, coupled with various recipes to reproduce it. I would enjoy hearing about your own experiences, as I am gearing up to reload .308Win for the first time (with decades of other reloading experience).

Thanks,
-Kirk

Kirk A is offline  
Remove Ads
Old February 19th, 2013, 05:16 PM   #2
Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 292
When I was shooting the M1A across the course I came into about 2k of M118LR. Great stuff, I came to think of it as 1moa ammo out of my rifle at 600yds. Now that doesn't mean I shot 200-20x, but if I did my part it would do very well at 600. Never shot it at 1k tho.

BTW its great brass for reloading. Other than the knerled match brass the LR brass is the only LC 7.62 brass I know of without a crimp. So you get to skip the swaging part of brass prep.

alsation is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 06:13 PM   #3
Rest in Peace
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Arizona mountains
Posts: 908
The M118LR is the current US Standard Competition/Sniper/Tactical round as made by Lake City. The changes that were made all took place right around the turn of the Century so it's performance has been consistent over the past 10 years, at least.

I think you'll find that shooters who do good with it think it is great. Shooters who don't do well, think it is junk. No surprise there.

alsation - The original M118 Match that was the Match standard from 1961 to 1982 also used the brass with un-crimped primers.

Thanks from alsation
raymeketa is offline  
 
Old February 19th, 2013, 06:40 PM   #4
M14 Forum Admin
 
XXIV Corps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northeastern Oklahoma
Posts: 13,362

Awards Showcase

Post The lost art of research has not been missed place yet....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk A View Post
M118LR 05: good or bad?
Thanks, -Kirk
This is a listing of most of the Lake City I have fired and tested over the years. I have never found any Lake City that had not been manufactured correctly.

Lake City, '58,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '63,[ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. year
Lake City, '64,[ LC MATCH], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. MATCH LC year M 118
Lake City, '65,[ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with purple primer sealant. MATCH FA year M 118
Lake City, '66,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with purple primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '66,[ LC MATCH], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. MATCH LC year M 118
Lake City, '70,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with light red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '70,[ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with green primer sealant. MATCH LC year M 118
Lake City, '71,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '81,[ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with purple primer sealant. year
Lake City, '82, [ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '84,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '85, [ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. year
Lake City, '86, [ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. MATCH LC year M 852
Lake City, '87,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '88, [ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. year NATO (+) M 118 SB
Lake City, '88, [ LC Match ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. MATCH LC year M 852
Lake City, '89,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '90,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '91,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '91,[ LC MATCH], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant.
Lake City, '94,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '95,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '98,[ LC ], Boxer, ring crimp with red primer sealant. NATO (+)
Lake City, '03,[ LC LR ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. LR 03 LC
Lake City, '04,[ LC LR ], Boxer, zero crimp with red primer sealant. LR 04 LC

Mil Surplus ammunition manufactures for the 7.62x51mm

My best scores with military surplus ammunition with my NM Springfield rifle.

1, M852 Lake City from 1991. Top score of 200-20X, on a SR-1 NRA standard 100 yard target, 1-20 round mag only with my NM M1A.
2, Argentine FLB, surplus from 1983, 200-16X.
3, M118LR Lake City from 2003, 200-13X.
4, German DAG, surplus from 1993, 200-12X.
5, M118SB Lake City from 1963, 200-10X.
6, M852 Lake City from 1988, 200-10X.
7, Radway Green surplus from 1990, 200-10X.
8, Greek surplus from 1980, 200-10X.
9, Australian MF surplus from 1966, 200-6X.
10, M118SB Lake City from 1985, a 199-12X.
11, Nigerian from 1970, 199-10X.
12, Portuguese m/963 surplus from 1979, a 199-10X.
13, Radway Green surplus from 1985, 198-12X.
14, Belgium surplus from 1977, 198-10X.
15, Bosnian surplus from 2003, 198-10X.
16, Radway Green surplus from 1995, 198-8X
17, South African surplus from 1980, 198-6X.
18, Santa Barbra surplus from 1980, 197-14X.
19, Argentine surplus from 1983, 197-8X.
20, German DAG, surplus from 1976, 197-8X.
21, Austria surplus from 1980, 197-6X.
22, German MEN 41, surplus from 1969, 197-6X.
23, Singapore surplus from 1986, 196-11X.
24, Israeli surplus from 1974, 196-10X.
25, Australian ADI surplus from 1988, 196-8X.
26, Bosnian M118 surplus from 2003, 196-8X.
27, Serbia surplus from 2002, 196-6X.
28, Malaysian surplus from 1982, 195-6X.
29, Malaysian surplus from 1983, 194-9X.
30, Lithuanian surplus from 2003, 194-6X.
31, Serbia surplus from 1989, 194-2X.
32, Venezuelan surplus from 1989, 194-2X.
33, Denmark, surplus from 1993, 193-2X.
34, Canadian, surplus from 1970, 192-8X.
35, Chilean, surplus from 1976, 191-4X.
36, Indonesian surplus from 1985, 190-6X
37, Portuguese m/963 surplus from 1978, 190-4X.
38, Austria surplus from 1978, 190-3X.
39, South African surplus from 1981, 189-1X.
40, Pakistan surplus from 1979. Score of 188-4X.

Thanks from Kirk A
XXIV Corps is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 07:29 PM   #5
Platoon Sergeant
 
Ezekiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 334
If you got the ammo for a good deal, it's great stuff.

I can't get LC LR or clone loads to shoot as-good-as or better then a 168 HPBT at 600 yards. I'm still messing around with this load and hope to get it right some day. My current prep is;

LC LR brass, federal primers, 43.1 of RL15, 175 SMK, OAL mag length.

Ezekiel is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 07:56 PM   #6
Lifer
 
82nd ABN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 10,899

Awards Showcase

Just reloaded 60 pieces of the brass. Case length 2.005 overall length 2.80, 175 gr SMK's 41.5 gr IMR-4895 case HS vary from 4-6 thousandths short of my chamber HS, CCI#34 primers. Think this is a pretty standard starting point. I will be shooting them out of a SM with a Krieger 1/10 rot bbl. up until now I've been shooting black hills 175 match, hoping for the same if not better results.

82nd ABN is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 08:04 PM   #7
Super Moderator
 
Phil McGrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Silverdale, WA.
Posts: 7,649

Awards Showcase

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezekiel View Post
If you got the ammo for a good deal, it's great stuff.

I can't get LC LR or clone loads to shoot as-good-as or better then a 168 HPBT at 600 yards. I'm still messing around with this load and hope to get it right some day. My current prep is;

LC LR brass, federal primers, 43.1 of RL15, 175 SMK, OAL mag length.
Try 42.0 IMR-4064 or 41.5 Varget COAL 2.82-2.83(maglenth) see if they close up.

Thanks from Kirk A and Buzzard II
Phil McGrath is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 08:31 PM   #8
Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 292
We reloaders need to keep in mind that most people only get to shoot 600 yds on match day. And remind folks that at 600 yds unless you're shooting on a very still day it can be tough to seperate the wind's effect from the group size. One way is to group at say 300 and then if satisfied take it back to 6. Once at 6 if you feel the wind is shoving you around a bit then look for waterline shots. At least that will tell you if you're getting uniform velocities

I am not an authority but that's the way I developed some good loads. Would like to hear other opinions.

alsation is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 05:16 AM   #9
Snappin In
 
Kirk A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 32
Thanks, everybody, for your help! I'll be looking for jugs of IMR-4064 and IMR-4895. (Anyone using H-4895?)

Kirk A is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 06:00 AM   #10
Dodgin' The Reaper
 
danthman114's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yuma, Az
Posts: 5,279
the good thing about 175gn and up is that id stays stable when it gos subsonic making it better for longer range shooting. 168 tends to wobble and stray off a bit...

danthman114 is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 09:53 AM   #11
Old Salt
 
Ole Silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,363
My load development to clone the M118LR.

GGG Brass - 2.005
CCI#34 primer
41.5g IMR4064
COAL 2.825
175SMK

I know the M118LR is prescribed with the Fed 210M primer but I got better results from CC!#34. Not alot better though. Go figure.

It's a winner in my M25 - 22inch WMMW

Ole Silver

Thanks from Bamban
Ole Silver is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 10:27 AM   #12
Lifer
 
Bamban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,904

Awards Showcase

Quote:
Originally Posted by alsation View Post
We reloaders need to keep in mind that most people only get to shoot 600 yds on match day. And remind folks that at 600 yds unless you're shooting on a very still day it can be tough to seperate the wind's effect from the group size. One way is to group at say 300 and then if satisfied take it back to 6. Once at 6 if you feel the wind is shoving you around a bit then look for waterline shots. At least that will tell you if you're getting uniform velocities

I am not an authority but that's the way I developed some good loads. Would like to hear other opinions.

+1

When you have a good load it makes it a lot easier to read and keep up with the wind. A good test is if you can punch the X ring with the first shot at 600 yards.

Bamban is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 11:10 AM   #13
Fire Team Leader
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Western New York
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil McGrath View Post
Try 42.0 IMR-4064 or 41.5 Varget COAL 2.82-2.83(maglenth) see if they close up.
Believe this. I use the same loads. Accuracy is outstanding.

Thanks from Phil McGrath
rifle21 is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 05:07 PM   #14
Super Moderator
 
Phil McGrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Silverdale, WA.
Posts: 7,649

Awards Showcase

Quote:
Originally Posted by alsation View Post
We reloaders need to keep in mind that most people only get to shoot 600 yds on match day. And remind folks that at 600 yds unless you're shooting on a very still day it can be tough to seperate the wind's effect from the group size. One way is to group at say 300 and then if satisfied take it back to 6. Once at 6 if you feel the wind is shoving you around a bit then look for waterline shots. At least that will tell you if you're getting uniform velocities

I am not an authority but that's the way I developed some good loads. Would like to hear other opinions.
I cheat a bit, when I had access to a chrono I did my chrono work at 100yds, when I has happy with the numbers I then tested accuracy at 200yds. Worked for me.

Phil McGrath is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2013, 11:00 AM   #15
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: antioch, ca
Posts: 14
It shoots well out of my 7.62 Garand. The 05 is supposed to be not as hot as previous years, the load was adjusted as the Middle East temperatures were causing higher than desired velocity.

Glad I bought mine before the prices went screaming up. Keeping my remaining stash for 600-1000 range.

orchard is offline  
Reply

  M14 Forum > M14 M1A Forum > Ammunition

m118lr


Search tags for this page
federal m118lr
,
m118 ammo
,
m118 ammo review
,
m118 lr
,
m118 lr review
,

m118lr

,
m118lr ammo
,
m118lr ammo review
,
m118lr clone
,
m118lr recipe
,
m118lr review
,
reviews on m118lr ammo
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Moderator Tools
Display Modes


Similar M14 Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going to try Fulton Armory's inspection service & see what is good and bad... jws360 The M14 138 March 12th, 2012 05:53 PM
The Range: Good Times, Bad Times, FIRST Time - Pics! Shugama The M14 11 October 31st, 2008 04:01 PM
GUN SHOWS the good the bad and the ugly Lruss Gun Shows 6 July 23rd, 2007 07:23 AM
US Optics... Good, bad or what? Chromedome Optics 0 December 25th, 2005 08:02 AM
SA Gen III Scope Rail - Good or Bad? Bill Ricca The M14 7 April 20th, 2004 11:16 AM



Top Gun Sites Top Sites List